The Infrastructure Projects
(01-08-2024, 05:26 PM)Tricky Wrote:
(01-08-2024, 08:22 AM)ToryTom Wrote:
(01-08-2024, 07:11 AM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote:
(31-07-2024, 09:46 PM)ToryTom Wrote:
(31-07-2024, 09:24 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: The huge difference is that Man Utd plan to build their new ground adjacent to the old one still within Old Trafford. Its a big industrial area with room for development.

Forest of course dont have the room and its just not possible, even a move within a few miles would seem to be impractical, pretty sure the club have looked at alternatives. So the option is Toton or some other site probably outside the City. Commercially a move would make sense but if you think that’s the only consideration in my opinion you miss the point. Personally I think that alternative strips the club of its identity and what we lose is far more than we gain.

Man City, Arsenal, West Ham, Brighton, Southampton, Leicester Derby , Sunderland all moved to bigger and better stadiums in different locations. I bet not many of their fans would regret those moves and wish to go back to their old stadiums. Why would Forest fans be any different.

Sorry but that is Dog S**t ^

None of them left from an iconic location like the City Ground for a start and non of them moved to a S**t tip like Toton.

You are completely missing a much bigger picture.

The love affair and the history and nostalgia  etc of the CG, doesn't it mean anything to you?

Those other clubs you mentioned didn't have that.

The comparison you are trying to make is not  valid and is actually a bit annoying and offensive.

‘Annoying and offensive’. That’s a bit over the top isn’t it. I am sure Man City Arsenal Sunderland WHam fans and even Derby ones would say they also have great histories and a lot of nostalgia for their old stadiums but they moved because they wanted to progress and move with the times. We risk being stuck in the past and seen as a novelty like a Preston North End or Huddersfield. A once succesful club living in the past. Top level football has changed dramatically in the last thirty years. Football in the premier league has taken off. Crowds are bigger and spectators expect much better facilities and experiences than in the 70’s and 80’s. If Forest don’t provide that people will go elsewhere. We live in more of a consumer society and loyalty to specific brands are much weaker. Recent general elections show that. At one time people would vote for one of the two parties all their life but now are much more fluid.

What an absolute c**k of a statement!!!! If FOREST fans don't like the stadium and the facilities it provides and will go elsewhere, then they aren't Forest fans!!!

The facilities when I started going to watch the Reds (50 years ago) were virtually non-existent in comparison to todays facilities. Outside toilets with no roof over them (unless you pissed down the Trent End steps!), no running water (either hot or cold!) minimal foods availability, no alcohol available, stood on packed to crushing terracing with only crush barriers in the way to stop the crowd cascading down from top to bottom, but which if you were on the wrong side of could (and did) cause significant injuries, fighting on the terraces and around the ground, all the way up to the station (and beyond occasionally), fenced in like animals, in partial wooden stands. I could go on. BUT!! I loved it and I'm sure every other true Forest fan, irrespective of which era they started watching OUR team, will say the same thing. They love the place. I did then and I do now.

I know there are many issues with the ground that do need urgent attention, especially in todays day and age, but irrespective of whether there is hot water or not or bird S**t on the terracing, it is our ground, our home, our history and our legacy. If people want to go elsewhere to watch their football with better facilities (a statement I find ridiculous to say the least), then in my opinion, f**k off to Man City or Arsenal or Spurs or West Ham and watch football from a distance in stadia with little or no atmosphere. 

One last thing to state, you look at other fans forums and see how many fans from other clubs love coming to the City Ground, with the most common point being made, that it is a proper old school football ground, not a lifeless bowl.

Newsflash. The world including football has changed a lot since you loved fans pissing down the Trent End steps. In every area of life people are more fickle, see themselves as consumers. That is especially for younger people especially who are the future of every club. Many thousands are unable to get tickets. To maintain the current interest you have to make hay whilst the sun shines. If we don’t they will go elsewhere. Many top clubs have moved to bigger better stadiums. Not many would go back. Over the years there has been lots of work exploring how the city ground might be expanded to compete with other premier league and the conclusion was always the same. Not feasible. Not adapting to a changed environment will only lead to demise.
Reply
Whilst I ultimately disagree with TT I believe you have a valid opinion and its a bit insulting to suggest you are talking rubbish. Yes I do agree other clubs who moved have history too. In addition younger fans go where they are entertained. My own nephew wants to follow the Sheep because he went on a trip to a match and they made a fuss of him. His Forest supporting Dad is mortified but can’t get him a ticket at the CG. Again its a valid point.

Football has indeed moved with the times but the City Ground hasn’t. Commercially it is currently a disaster and yes I would prefer to be able to wash my hands after a half time piss, Im not 14 years old anymore. The whole ground needs urgently updating and to be able to bring in more revenue.

The best way to do that? Demolish the whole damn thing and rebuild a stadium on the same or nearby site with other facilities and create a Forest Village. That wont happen for many different reasons but principally because there isnt the space.
However where our opinions differ is I believe selling our soul when we can make do isnt worth it, particularly when the option is to leave a good location to go to a (very) bad one. You think it is worth it and fans will come around to the idea. Its a fair debate, lets see how it pans out.
Reply
(01-08-2024, 09:48 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Whilst I ultimately disagree with TT I believe you have a valid opinion and its a bit insulting to suggest you are talking rubbish. Yes I do agree other clubs who moved have history too. In addition younger fans go where they are entertained. My own nephew wants to follow the Sheep because he went on a trip to a match and they made a fuss of him. His Forest supporting Dad is mortified but can’t get him a ticket at the CG. Again its a valid point.

Football has indeed moved with the times but the City Ground hasn’t. Commercially it is currently a disaster and yes I would prefer to be able to wash my hands after a half time piss, Im not 14 years old anymore. The whole ground needs urgently updating and to be able to bring in more revenue.

The best way to do that? Demolish the whole damn thing and rebuild a stadium on the same or nearby site with other facilities and create a Forest Village. That wont happen for many different reasons but principally because there isnt the space.
However where our opinions differ is I believe selling our soul when we can make do isnt worth it, particularly when the option is to leave a good location to go to a (very) bad one. You think it is worth it and fans will come around to the idea. Its a fair debate, lets see how it pans out.

If Carling did football stadiums ours would be at the City Ground. No Forest fan would say different. If it’s possible to build a much larger multi purpose stadium with great hospitality facilities then that would be the best option for the club by far. However, the current stalemate for just 5,000 extra seats as already dragged on for five years and got no further down line. Doughty looked at expanding to much bigger and got the same answer as the current owners. It genuinely
doesn’t look possible.
Reply
Reading between the lines it looks like the club were offered a lot of land at Toton on the cheap. It probably would have been enough to build the stadium with the facilities they wanted and maybe academy and trading facilities as well. The city ground site could no way match that. It sounded like an opportunity similar to that offered West Ham. Probably the potential Toton stadium would be more suited for football because it would have been built just for that purpose. The downside would have been the nostalgia older fans have for the City Ground and its distance away from the City Ground site. I still would not be surprised if we eventually move there because it will be extremely unlikely, because of multiple reasons, the City Ground site can be developed in the way the club want.
Reply
(02-08-2024, 06:51 AM)ToryTom Wrote: Reading between the lines it looks like the club were offered a lot of land at Toton on the cheap. It probably would have been enough to build the stadium with the facilities they wanted and maybe academy and trading facilities as well. The city ground site could no way match that. It sounded like an opportunity similar to that offered West Ham. Probably the potential Toton stadium would be more suited for football because it would have been built just for that purpose. The downside would have been the nostalgia older fans have for the City Ground and its distance away from the City Ground site. I still would not be surprised if we eventually move there because it will be extremely unlikely, because of multiple reasons, the City Ground site can be developed in the way the club want.

IMO and the POV I have regarding Toton, isnt so much the distance from the City Ground but the distance from the City!!

Forest have always predominantly been the city side and Notts the county side. The fact the City Ground is now in the county rather than within the city limits was down to political boundaries changing and the ground is just yards outside of the boundary at present. But to move out to the Derbyshire border is just not comprehensible. 

IF the club decide it is not an option to stay on the CG site, then I would hope they can find an alternative site somewhere nearer to the city, but where is anyones guess.
"It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time, it's Trickay, It's Tricky, Tricky, Tricky Tricky" - Run DMC
Reply
How about knocking down the council house and building a ground in the Square, cant get more central then that!
Reply
(02-08-2024, 09:07 AM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: How about knocking down the council house and building a ground in the Square, cant get more central then that!

Unfortunately we’ve missed a few opportunities to rebuild in a central location which I think most fans would find acceptable. I think with imagination it could have been possible to put a stadium at the Broadmarsh site develop it into a multi purpose leisure and commercial area. Would have needed too many people to let go of their preconceptions that football fans cause problems in city centres though.
Reply
Take it back to it's namesake - The Forest rec, plenty of room!
Reply
(02-08-2024, 09:07 AM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: How about knocking down the council house and building a ground in the Square, cant get more central then that!

The summer sand-pit and the winter ice rink might cause issues, although some might argue it'd be like the old days.
Reply
Played great entertaining and winning football on those type of pitches under BC Pap, how would some of those players fare on the snooker table pitches we now have these days? I think even my amateur footballing days long past would have improved me to a much better standard thinking of some of playing fields of long past around Nottingham and the wider area!!
Reply
No dates given but according to Dan Taylor's article in The Athletic the corner sections are still some way off completion:

"For now, however, work to create a “corner box” development between the Trent End and the Brian Clough stand remains unfinished. The new facility will not be ready for a while yet and nor will the specially created annexe that is being put up for owner Evangelos Marinakis to watch matches, starting tomorrow with their first game of the new Premier League season against Bournemouth. Work is ongoing — a frenzy of hard hats, fluorescent-jacketed workmen and whirring machinery."
Reply
However - the club have managed to install a ridiculously over-the-top star outside one of the doors at the back of the Peter Taylor stand.
Reply


Forum Jump: