(30-04-2024, 08:53 PM)Percyflage Wrote: (30-04-2024, 08:13 PM)Plymouth red Wrote: At least it removes all doubt. They are completely incompetent.
There's a proverb for this. 'There is none so blind as they that will not see.'
Having thought about it, counter-intuitively it suits Atwell and the PGMOL to be seen in this case to be merely incompetent. "We're all human", said Webb today.
For a highly paid professional to demonstrate such a fundamental misreading of a clearly apparent action, and also the rules that apply to it, stretches credibility till it snaps.
This is beyond incompetence because to reach Atwell's position requires both working eyes and an understanding of basic rules.
Is there a slyer form of dishonesty than wilful blindness?
Love your post- a true wordsmith.
And the subtle nuance within raises some very basic questions for Webb which I will frame in very basic language-
1. If not biased, why was Attwell so shit?
(He’s only human doesn’t really cut it, Howard; at least not with the benefit of countless replays and slow motions). VAR is meant to remove that human error isn’t it?
2. What are you going to do about it?
(Will the axe fall? No mention or reparations, disciplinary action or solution instigation other than ‘we sit around and talk about it every month’).
And a broader question-
3. If the first two aren’t penalties, then why are the rest of your employees giving them on a regular basis in other games and for other teams? (Eg the Man Utd handball the same day and a hundred ‘soft’ penalties given for similar challenges as that on Reyna.)
Is the ‘humanity’ defence not just another way of dressing up mass incompetence?
It still has a very distinct smell to it.