NFFC Financial Talk
Oh and the rules are in place for this year too. It’s next year they change at the earliest and more likely the season after.
Reply
(18-03-2024, 09:58 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Ultimately if we hadn’t made such a dogs arse of the season on the pitch we would all be laughing and congratulating EM. He knew what he was doing, we were always at a competitive disadvantage so did everything possible to ensure we were competitive in the PL, if that meant bending the rules so be it.
That combined with further investment over the summer should have made us comfortably mid table and a 4 point deduction of little to no consequence. No I don’t want to hear about referees and AFCON. As MR says we have 9 games for our under achieving squad to put things right. i hope they have the spine to do it.

Can see his logic on the top 10 demand in October/ November now!
Reply
The other side of this is we made huge mistakes in recruitment. Hwang, bowler, Richards, Scarpa, Shelvey, obrien, Dennis, lingard. That has been our major issue here.
Reply
(18-03-2024, 09:09 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(18-03-2024, 09:05 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Initial deduction 8 points with 4 points reduced because of early plea and cooperation.

All 6 mitigation pleas were dismissed.

We could have saved a bit more money and not hired DeMarco from all the good he did us.

No it was 6 with 2 reduced. 

They came down from 8 to 6 before mitigations which you could attribute to DeMarco.

I think you are being generous to Di Marco to be honest.
Reply
To be fair to the commission that have come down half way of what the league wanted. Masters is a glove puppet to the protected 6-10 clubs that want a closed shop.
Reply
Yep, ive just read all 50 odd pages. Every mitigation put forward has failed. I reckon i could've done a better job.
Reply
It's all over the report that Atletico Madrid bid 50 mil Euros in June for Jonno and we rejected it.


Playing the absolute victims if that's true we need to move on and keep this trend of whining about refs and the prem away from the pitch.
Reply
We got the 2 points back for cooperation but I cant help but think the club wanted the sanction to arrive this season rather than next, when the league undoubtedly gets harder.
Reply
(18-03-2024, 10:43 PM)Paplane Wrote: Yep, ive just read all 50 odd pages. Every mitigation put forward has failed. I reckon i could've done a better job.

It's a fun read isn't it?

We did fail by 35m, think we got off lightly tbh.
Reply
(18-03-2024, 10:45 PM)Paplane Wrote: We got the 2 points back for cooperation but I cant help but think the club wanted the sanction to arrive this season rather than next,  when the league undoubtedly gets harder.

Do you think that's a bad decision? I think it's pretty sensible to me. We should be able to finish 4 points ahead of Luton, Burnley and Sheff Utd plus Everton -10 odd.
Reply
Wood, Shelvey, danillo - would we have stayed up without them?
Reply
Much depends on Everton too. If they don’t get at least 3 more points and more likely 4-6 then we’ve been done. They have delayed the process from last year into this year- not the prem fault. They have not complied for a second time. I wonder how big their second failure is? They continued to spend this year above the permitted losses whilst under the charge of the previous season. I have some sympathy in that they in theory will be punished twice for two years of the same period with no precedent until this year. Man City and Chelsea charges stink.
Reply


Forum Jump: