+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: NFFC Financial Talk (/showthread.php?tid=546)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - DR Forest - 05-04-2024
(04-04-2024, 08:40 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: A very readable analysis of finances and comparison with other PL clubs. Done by Macguire who I know some don’t like but I found it interesting.
Staggeringly our spending from last season propelled us into the top 20 of European clubs for an entire 10 year period from 2014.
Didn’t read it all but skimmed over the graphs and two things stood out for me.
Generally speaking, the biggest transfer fees lie with the big 6 (no surprise) but, apart from reckless Chelsea, the lower salary to turnover percentages are also enjoyed by the big clubs thanks to their massive incomes.
With the proposed changes to PSR being based on salary as a percentage of income, going forward, the big clubs will make their positions at the top almost unassailable from sheer financial leverage.
The PL stinks.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - stirred - 05-04-2024
It’s not just the PL though, it’s a UEFA rule for clubs playing in Europe. So PL is looking to align with it - if they didn’t then teams could in theory outspend the teams in Europe to overtake them but then wouldn’t be able to play in Europe the following season anyway.
The underlying problem is that UEFA have bowed to the pressure of the rich clubs to put this version of financial rules in place going forwards. And what can we do about that?
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - The reds - 05-04-2024
How many points are Everton likely to get. Apparently Monday is announcement day, If they appeal I think it would run to the end of this season whereas our Appeal Hearing is supposed to be anytime before 12th April - Announcement by end of April.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - Reds73 - 05-04-2024
(05-04-2024, 07:35 PM)The reds Wrote: How many points are Everton likely to get. Apparently Monday is announcement day, If they appeal I think it would run to the end of this season whereas our Appeal Hearing is supposed to be anytime before 12th April - Announcement by end of April.
Has to be 4-6
It’s an immediate 3 points for breaching, because their losses have increased they don’t have mitigation.
So that constitutes a serious breach of another 3 points.
It’s just whether they get a credit because they have been punished for 2 of the 3 yrs.
Best case for them is 4 I reckon, worst case 6.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - The reds - 06-04-2024
By the sounds of it Fulham and Bournemouth should be in breach seemingly Promotion bonuses have been excluded for them, if that is true we are going to court.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - Jacksbadhobbits - 06-04-2024
(06-04-2024, 08:32 AM)The reds Wrote: By the sounds of it Fulham and Bournemouth should be in breach seemingly Promotion bonuses have been excluded for them, if that is true we are going to court.
what is the source of that information.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - nffc93 - 06-04-2024
(06-04-2024, 08:32 AM)The reds Wrote: By the sounds of it Fulham and Bournemouth should be in breach seemingly Promotion bonuses have been excluded for them, if that is true we are going to court.
If that is found to be proven then we get our points back. It's as simple as that.
Can this be verified?
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - The reds - 06-04-2024
(06-04-2024, 08:51 AM)nffc93 Wrote:(06-04-2024, 08:32 AM)The reds Wrote: By the sounds of it Fulham and Bournemouth should be in breach seemingly Promotion bonuses have been excluded for them, if that is true we are going to court.
If that is found to be proven then we get our points back. It's as simple as that.
Can this be verified?
Stefan Borson an expert saying he doesn’t see how Fulham don’t breach same as Bournemouth. With inclusion of Bonuses. Swiss Ramble said he doesn’t know how Bournemouth passed either they would have been around 8m over with Bonuses included.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - nffc93 - 06-04-2024
(06-04-2024, 08:59 AM)The reds Wrote:(06-04-2024, 08:51 AM)nffc93 Wrote:(06-04-2024, 08:32 AM)The reds Wrote: By the sounds of it Fulham and Bournemouth should be in breach seemingly Promotion bonuses have been excluded for them, if that is true we are going to court.
If that is found to be proven then we get our points back. It's as simple as that.
Can this be verified?
Stefan Borson an expert saying he doesn’t see how Fulham don’t breach same as Bournemouth. With inclusion of Bonuses. Swiss Ramble said he doesn’t know how Bournemouth passed either they would have been around 8m over with Bonuses included.
What an absolute shambles
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - DR Forest - 06-04-2024
I don’t know if that is true but it’s hardly news if it is.
In fact, I don’t know why we didn’t argue the point more in the first place.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - Salvatore Matrecano - 06-04-2024
Does anyone know if at the appeal we are allowed to argue our case again? Or is it simply a matter of a committee looking at the original evidence and verdict again with no input from us?
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - The reds - 06-04-2024
(06-04-2024, 02:53 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Does anyone know if at the appeal we are allowed to argue our case again? Or is it simply a matter of a committee looking at the original evidence and verdict again with no input from us?
You would assume so. I find it extraordinary that the initial hearing was done on an online meeting,that is very professional…