NFFC Financial Talk

[Fumanchew]

For example it’s like us saying we’ve got sangare for 30 mil on a 5 year contract and instead of doing 5 pockets of 6mil, they were doing, 10.5 mil year one. 9 mil year two. 6 mil year 3. 3 mil year 4. 1.5 mil year 5.

[stirred]

For example it’s like us saying we’ve got sangare for 30 mil on a 5 year contract and instead of doing 5 pockets of 6mil, they were doing, 10.5 mil year one. 9 mil year two. 6 mil year 3. 3 mil year 4. 1.5 mil year 5.

Derby? I don't think so. They were saying he'll be worth say 10m at the end, so they only need to amortize 20m over the 5 years not 30m. That's how I understood it.

Except with the Bosman ruling that doesn't hold up...

[ozzyten10]

Man Utd are set to lose upwards of 200m for the 3 year rolling period for next year at current rates- huge impact of poor results. Estimates put Newcastle and Chelsea on similar levels. The premier league are changing the rules for this next period.
This league is really corrupt to the core.

[wassy04]

Man Utd are set to lose upwards of 200m for the 3 year rolling period for next year at current rates- huge impact of poor results. Estimates put Newcastle and Chelsea on similar levels. The premier league are changing the rules for this next period.
This league is really corrupt to the core.

The thresholds haven't increased with inflation though which is partly why they've become tougher than intended. They've been the same since the rules began.

[ozzyten10]

Fine but why next year and not this? Also the covid scam of allowable losses is just covering this up for many clubs

[wassy04]

Fine but why next year and not this? Also the covid scam of allowable losses is just covering this up for many clubs

Because inflation was like 10% last year and because UEFA adjusted their rules. Plus we benefitted from those covid allowable losses as much as anyone else.

We were allowed to keep a year on the accounts where we made a small loss for an extra year, definitely really helped us.

[ozzyten10]

Not to the extent these premiership clubs were getting away with. Anyway - take our medicine and hope the dose is proportional to the crime.

[Reds73]

Not to the extent these premiership clubs were getting away with. Anyway - take our medicine and hope the dose is proportional to the crime.

De Marco will get us sorted.

[BomberBowyer]

Something that has got me thinking about the Johnson sale after reading some comments. Was he actually fit to sell on the 30/6? Wasn’t he injured at the start of preseason with an ankle injury and unable to play and was in light training only? I think some suggested at the time it may be a ruse as we were expecting to sell him. If recall correctly he was only 50/50 for the first league game. Could it be that he wouldn’t have been able to pass a medical or clubs wouldn’t have signed him at that point? Yes I’m clutching at straws but maybe that is a further mitigating factor?

[wassy04]

Something that has got me thinking about the Johnson sale after reading some comments. Was he actually fit to sell on the 30/6? Wasn’t he injured at the start of preseason with an ankle injury and unable to play and was in light training only? I think some suggested at the time it may be a ruse as we were expecting to sell him. If recall correctly he was only 50/50 for the first league game. Could it be that he wouldn’t have been able to pass a medical or clubs wouldn’t have signed him at that point? Yes I’m clutching at straws but maybe that is a further mitigating factor?

Would that not work against us if he was injured as we couldn't sell him therefore invalidating our claim we could've sold him?

[Sniffer Dog (Admin)]

Something that has got me thinking about the Johnson sale after reading some comments. Was he actually fit to sell on the 30/6? Wasn’t he injured at the start of preseason with an ankle injury and unable to play and was in light training only? I think some suggested at the time it may be a ruse as we were expecting to sell him. If recall correctly he was only 50/50 for the first league game. Could it be that he wouldn’t have been able to pass a medical or clubs wouldn’t have signed him at that point? Yes I’m clutching at straws but maybe that is a further mitigating factor?

Would that not work against us if he was injured as we couldn't sell him therefore invalidating our claim we could've sold him?

There is nothing in the rules that says that you cannot sell an injured player.

[Salvatore Matrecano]

Something that has got me thinking about the Johnson sale after reading some comments. Was he actually fit to sell on the 30/6? Wasn’t he injured at the start of preseason with an ankle injury and unable to play and was in light training only? I think some suggested at the time it may be a ruse as we were expecting to sell him. If recall correctly he was only 50/50 for the first league game. Could it be that he wouldn’t have been able to pass a medical or clubs wouldn’t have signed him at that point? Yes I’m clutching at straws but maybe that is a further mitigating factor?

Would that not work against us if he was injured as we couldn't sell him therefore invalidating our claim we could've sold him?

There is nothing in the rules that says that you cannot sell an injured player.

Omar Richards likes this post.