Posts: 8,998
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
55
23-08-2021, 06:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-08-2021, 06:08 PM by Strawberry Avenger.)
(23-08-2021, 06:04 PM)Alf Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:00 PM)PsychoStanleyStone Wrote: he should of gone today, he has to go now really
the stats say we cannot risk going into the Derby game with Chris
it's a definate winnable and needs to be a turning point
sorry Chris you got to go now, our only hope is the bounce
Tbh mate, I'd sooner Hughton stick around until the Derby game at least.
He deserves a chance with Garner here, and if Derby beat us there won't be any doubt that he has to go.
Plus it gives any potential new manager a bit of breathing room, rather than throwing them head first into a Derby game.
To me, if Hughton had brought in, say, 14 of his own players and lost the four games and all those in pre-season? I'd be concerned. But I'd still give him until after the International Break to start making progress.
But he has yet to make a permanent outfield signing last Summer or this Summer. Has any other Forest manager been that badly backed?
What's the new CEO doing about that? (And if it IS going to be a relegation season because Forest have a rookie CEO, the person you DO want is Hughton. He'd be a safe pair of hands whilst Dane...pulls his finger out.)
SA.
Posts: 4,170
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
42
(23-08-2021, 06:05 PM)Strawberry Avenger Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:04 PM)Alf Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:00 PM)PsychoStanleyStone Wrote: he should of gone today, he has to go now really
the stats say we cannot risk going into the Derby game with Chris
it's a definate winnable and needs to be a turning point
sorry Chris you got to go now, our only hope is the bounce
Tbh mate, I'd sooner Hughton stick around until the Derby game at least.
He deserves a chance with Garner here, and if Derby beat us there won't be any doubt that he has to go.
Plus it gives any potential new manager a bit of breathing room, rather than throwing them head first into a Derby game.
To me, if Hughton had brought in, say, 14 of his own players and lost the four games and all those in pre-season? I'd be concerned. But I'd still give him until after the International Break to start making progress.
But he has yet to make a permanent outfield signing last Summer or this Summer. Has any other Forest manager been that badly backed?
What's the new CEO doing about that? (And if it IS going to be a relegation season because Forest have a rookie CEO, the person you DO want is Hughton. He'd be a safe pair of hands whilst Dane...pulls his finger out.)
SA.
Chris hughtons record last season suggests he is not a safe pair of hands. He had his knockaert and Murray too, players he wanted. We were awful.
Posts: 345
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2021
(23-08-2021, 06:09 PM)Marinakis Red Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:05 PM)Strawberry Avenger Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:04 PM)Alf Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:00 PM)PsychoStanleyStone Wrote: he should of gone today, he has to go now really
the stats say we cannot risk going into the Derby game with Chris
it's a definate winnable and needs to be a turning point
sorry Chris you got to go now, our only hope is the bounce
Tbh mate, I'd sooner Hughton stick around until the Derby game at least.
He deserves a chance with Garner here, and if Derby beat us there won't be any doubt that he has to go.
Plus it gives any potential new manager a bit of breathing room, rather than throwing them head first into a Derby game.
To me, if Hughton had brought in, say, 14 of his own players and lost the four games and all those in pre-season? I'd be concerned. But I'd still give him until after the International Break to start making progress.
But he has yet to make a permanent outfield signing last Summer or this Summer. Has any other Forest manager been that badly backed?
What's the new CEO doing about that? (And if it IS going to be a relegation season because Forest have a rookie CEO, the person you DO want is Hughton. He'd be a safe pair of hands whilst Dane...pulls his finger out.)
SA.
Chris hughtons record last season suggests he is not a safe pair of hands. He had his knockaert and Murray too, players he wanted. We were awful.
Yep, spot on.
Knoackert was absolutely god awful too. Contributed more to opposition teams goals than our own.
Posts: 8,998
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
55
(23-08-2021, 06:09 PM)Marinakis Red Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:05 PM)Strawberry Avenger Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:04 PM)Alf Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:00 PM)PsychoStanleyStone Wrote: he should of gone today, he has to go now really
the stats say we cannot risk going into the Derby game with Chris
it's a definate winnable and needs to be a turning point
sorry Chris you got to go now, our only hope is the bounce
Tbh mate, I'd sooner Hughton stick around until the Derby game at least.
He deserves a chance with Garner here, and if Derby beat us there won't be any doubt that he has to go.
Plus it gives any potential new manager a bit of breathing room, rather than throwing them head first into a Derby game.
To me, if Hughton had brought in, say, 14 of his own players and lost the four games and all those in pre-season? I'd be concerned. But I'd still give him until after the International Break to start making progress.
But he has yet to make a permanent outfield signing last Summer or this Summer. Has any other Forest manager been that badly backed?
What's the new CEO doing about that? (And if it IS going to be a relegation season because Forest have a rookie CEO, the person you DO want is Hughton. He'd be a safe pair of hands whilst Dane...pulls his finger out.)
SA.
Chris hughtons record last season suggests he is not a safe pair of hands. He had his knockaert and Murray too, players he wanted. We were awful.
Hughton didn't have any permanent outfield signings.
We were left scrabbling around in January. The ones we did bring in DID make enough (Garner and Krov' linking the back to the front of the team) of an impact to keep Forest up. Even Murray got a brace that gave Forest 3 points. Keeping in mind we only avoided relegation by 8 points?
Had Forest brought in a striker last year with fresh legs, things might have been very different. Still waiting on that striker though.
Attritional football is what you get when you don't recruit well. The team basically becomes a punching bag.
Until we get the promised recruitment (Dane said 9 players himself?) then it doesn't matter what Hughton tries. He's damned.
At least we have the progressive Garner. And we should see a very different type of Forest against Wolves with Fornah probably playing alongside him. *Fingers crossed, eh?
SA.
Posts: 4,170
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
42
(23-08-2021, 06:16 PM)Strawberry Avenger Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:09 PM)Marinakis Red Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:05 PM)Strawberry Avenger Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:04 PM)Alf Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:00 PM)PsychoStanleyStone Wrote: he should of gone today, he has to go now really
the stats say we cannot risk going into the Derby game with Chris
it's a definate winnable and needs to be a turning point
sorry Chris you got to go now, our only hope is the bounce
Tbh mate, I'd sooner Hughton stick around until the Derby game at least.
He deserves a chance with Garner here, and if Derby beat us there won't be any doubt that he has to go.
Plus it gives any potential new manager a bit of breathing room, rather than throwing them head first into a Derby game.
To me, if Hughton had brought in, say, 14 of his own players and lost the four games and all those in pre-season? I'd be concerned. But I'd still give him until after the International Break to start making progress.
But he has yet to make a permanent outfield signing last Summer or this Summer. Has any other Forest manager been that badly backed?
What's the new CEO doing about that? (And if it IS going to be a relegation season because Forest have a rookie CEO, the person you DO want is Hughton. He'd be a safe pair of hands whilst Dane...pulls his finger out.)
SA.
Chris hughtons record last season suggests he is not a safe pair of hands. He had his knockaert and Murray too, players he wanted. We were awful.
Hughton didn't have any permanent outfield signings.
We were left scrabbling around in January. The ones we did bring in DID make enough (Garner and Krov' linking the back to the front of the team) of an impact to keep Forest up. Even Murray got a brace that gave Forest 3 points. Keeping in mind we only avoided relegation by 8 points?
Had Forest brought in a striker last year with fresh legs, things might have been very different. Still waiting on that striker though.
Attritional football is what you get when you don't recruit well. The team basically becomes a punching bag.
Until we get the promised recruitment (Dane said 9 players himself?) then it doesn't matter what Hughton tries. He's damned.
At least we have the progressive Garner. And we should see a very different type of Forest against Wolves with Fornah probably playing alongside him. *Fingers crossed, eh?
SA.
Dane better start using his own money. Hughton got the striker he wanted. Glenn Murray. The football is dire mate but if it is what you enjoy who am I to argue. But stop banging the outfield drum. You have said it on every post for about a week and it really is getting tedious.
Posts: 345
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2021
(23-08-2021, 06:19 PM)Marinakis Red Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:16 PM)Strawberry Avenger Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:09 PM)Marinakis Red Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:05 PM)Strawberry Avenger Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:04 PM)Alf Wrote: Tbh mate, I'd sooner Hughton stick around until the Derby game at least.
He deserves a chance with Garner here, and if Derby beat us there won't be any doubt that he has to go.
Plus it gives any potential new manager a bit of breathing room, rather than throwing them head first into a Derby game.
To me, if Hughton had brought in, say, 14 of his own players and lost the four games and all those in pre-season? I'd be concerned. But I'd still give him until after the International Break to start making progress.
But he has yet to make a permanent outfield signing last Summer or this Summer. Has any other Forest manager been that badly backed?
What's the new CEO doing about that? (And if it IS going to be a relegation season because Forest have a rookie CEO, the person you DO want is Hughton. He'd be a safe pair of hands whilst Dane...pulls his finger out.)
SA.
Chris hughtons record last season suggests he is not a safe pair of hands. He had his knockaert and Murray too, players he wanted. We were awful.
Hughton didn't have any permanent outfield signings.
We were left scrabbling around in January. The ones we did bring in DID make enough (Garner and Krov' linking the back to the front of the team) of an impact to keep Forest up. Even Murray got a brace that gave Forest 3 points. Keeping in mind we only avoided relegation by 8 points?
Had Forest brought in a striker last year with fresh legs, things might have been very different. Still waiting on that striker though.
Attritional football is what you get when you don't recruit well. The team basically becomes a punching bag.
Until we get the promised recruitment (Dane said 9 players himself?) then it doesn't matter what Hughton tries. He's damned.
At least we have the progressive Garner. And we should see a very different type of Forest against Wolves with Fornah probably playing alongside him. *Fingers crossed, eh?
SA.
Dane better start using his own money. Hughton got the striker he wanted. Glenn Murray. The football is dire mate but if it is what you enjoy who am I to argue. But stop banging the outfield drum. You have said it on every post for about a week and it really is getting tedious.
I don't blame them not letting him get permanent signings. He wanted Dan Golsing, before Harry Arter had his biggest contribution at Forest and told him not to come here.
Posts: 2,270
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation:
19
(23-08-2021, 06:20 PM)SSM Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:19 PM)Marinakis Red Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:16 PM)Strawberry Avenger Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:09 PM)Marinakis Red Wrote: (23-08-2021, 06:05 PM)Strawberry Avenger Wrote: To me, if Hughton had brought in, say, 14 of his own players and lost the four games and all those in pre-season? I'd be concerned. But I'd still give him until after the International Break to start making progress.
But he has yet to make a permanent outfield signing last Summer or this Summer. Has any other Forest manager been that badly backed?
What's the new CEO doing about that? (And if it IS going to be a relegation season because Forest have a rookie CEO, the person you DO want is Hughton. He'd be a safe pair of hands whilst Dane...pulls his finger out.)
SA.
Chris hughtons record last season suggests he is not a safe pair of hands. He had his knockaert and Murray too, players he wanted. We were awful.
Hughton didn't have any permanent outfield signings.
We were left scrabbling around in January. The ones we did bring in DID make enough (Garner and Krov' linking the back to the front of the team) of an impact to keep Forest up. Even Murray got a brace that gave Forest 3 points. Keeping in mind we only avoided relegation by 8 points?
Had Forest brought in a striker last year with fresh legs, things might have been very different. Still waiting on that striker though.
Attritional football is what you get when you don't recruit well. The team basically becomes a punching bag.
Until we get the promised recruitment (Dane said 9 players himself?) then it doesn't matter what Hughton tries. He's damned.
At least we have the progressive Garner. And we should see a very different type of Forest against Wolves with Fornah probably playing alongside him. *Fingers crossed, eh?
SA.
Dane better start using his own money. Hughton got the striker he wanted. Glenn Murray. The football is dire mate but if it is what you enjoy who am I to argue. But stop banging the outfield drum. You have said it on every post for about a week and it really is getting tedious.
I don't blame them not letting him get permanent signings. He wanted Dan Golsing, before Harry Arter had his biggest contribution at Forest and told him not to come here.
Yep, we’d have had another past-his-best guy on big wages if it was up to Sir Defendalot. We got Garner despite him not because of him. Or maybe it was because of him - why did Arter tell Gosling not to come?!
Anyway, he has to go and we all know it. Maybe it would work best if we give him the push before Derby but don’t have the new guy in place yet - or one of those where he is appointed the day before but sits in the stands and lets a caretaker do the match ‘until he’s had chance to meet the players’ to save the possibility of starting with a bad derby.
Posts: 12,008
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
84
Serious question. Did Arter put Gosling off us or is it just an unfounded twitter rumour?
Posts: 4,170
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
42
(23-08-2021, 07:45 PM)Paplane Wrote: Serious question. Did Arter put Gosling off us or is it just an unfounded twitter rumour?
That is why arter was told to find a new club.
Posts: 4,937
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
47
Currently playing for the u23- you can watch online here https://tv.alfretontownfootballclub.com/live
He doesn’t look like a stand out player though…
Posts: 345
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2021
(23-08-2021, 08:04 PM)ozzyten10 Wrote: Currently playing for the u23- you can watch online.
He doesn’t look like a stand out player though…
First half he gave up a dangerous free-kick on the edge of our box. Made a horror tackle and got booked, and got megged in the middle of the park. Other than that, he's passed backwards a lot.
Larsson and McAdam done well. Some tenacity from McDonnell who's gone off for Fewster.
Lots of running from Salmon, but should have scored.
Gibson-Hammond really keen to get forward, probably been a little wasteful in possession, however.
Posts: 12,008
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
84
(23-08-2021, 07:57 PM)Marinakis Red Wrote: (23-08-2021, 07:45 PM)Paplane Wrote: Serious question. Did Arter put Gosling off us or is it just an unfounded twitter rumour?
That is why arter was told to find a new club.
Are you absolutely sure? Its a fairly serious accusation and it sounds like something some arse would jusy make up.
|