Nottingham Forest - Bournemouth
Let’s look positive…..we are only 4 points off a playoff place….
Reply
On the downside, Sheep are above us…
Reply
It was nice that the fans got a goal to cheer at least.

Tyler Walker’s goal against Leeds was the previous home goal with fans in the ground!
Reply
Anyone listening ro Ch interview. The man is a joke. He hasnt got a clue its almost like he wasnt watching the same game.

Idiot... we played well... we were threatening ao i didnt make changes.

Christ fook off now
Reply
Too many players today not good enough. Hughton can't be happy that they walked through are defence multiple times.

Midfield pairing of Colback and Yates doesn't work when we have the ball. We have to go wide, opposition know what's going to happen so can defend it.
Reply
CH had the benefit of no fans in the ground last season. This season he won’t get away with the negative tactics. 3 games until the international break and the end of the transfer window. Stick or twist?
Reply
(14-08-2021, 05:49 PM)Long John Wrote: CH had the benefit of no fans in the ground last season. This season he won’t get away with the negative tactics. 3 games until the international break and the end of the transfer window. Stick or twist?

Sack him now. He is incapable of change
Reply
Well that was frustrating.

Positives
- Being back where we belong.
- The two loans look OK.
- Samba didn't make a single save-he should have though.
- Carvalho looked confident when on.
- Was in pub from 11.45.
- It was sunny.
- Daughter got a pic with Leigh Wood.
- Plenty of room for improvement.......

Negatives
- Continued to look toothless
- Defence looked very shaky for goals.
- We never upped it when they went down to 10.
- Hughton really did not want to gamble at 1-2 or against 10 men.
- Grabban did not look sharp.
- We have a problem defensively.

Overall, somewhat disappointing, but Bournemouth looked a very decent side. Brooks best player on park until red carded needlessly.
Reply
Just got in. Had a quick flick through the responses and they are pretty predictable from some who clearly werent there actually watching it.
We lost because of two basic defensive errors and the lack of a decent striker, not because of CH.
Reply
Why to we persist with 4-2-3-1 system when if you check it out the better sides both in the Prem and EFL play 4-3-3. Me thinks it time to change as we have the players already at the club to play this system but do we have that desire by the manager?
Reply
(14-08-2021, 06:03 PM)zicorice Wrote: Well that was frustrating.

Positives
- Being back where we belong.
- The two loans look OK.
- Samba didn't make a single save-he should have though.
- Carvalho looked confident when on.
- Was in pub from 11.45.
- It was sunny.
- Daughter got a pic with Leigh Wood.
- Plenty of room for improvement.......

Negatives
- Continued to look toothless
- Defence looked very shaky for goals.
- We never upped it when they went down to 10.
- Hughton really did not want to gamble at 1-2 or against 10 men.
- Grabban did not look sharp.
- We have a problem defensively.

Overall, somewhat disappointing, but Bournemouth looked a very decent side. Brooks best player on park until red carded needlessly.
But wasn’t this a second string Bournemouth side with 7-8 first team players out  and were down to 10 men for half an hour , but were still a decent side, or did we make them look decent?
Reply
(14-08-2021, 06:05 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Just got in. Had a quick flick through  the responses and they are pretty predictable from some who clearly werent there actually watching it.
We lost because of two basic defensive errors and the lack of a decent striker, not because of CH.

I say we lost because neither of the two central midfielders are capable of dictating the tempo and direction of the game.
Forest need a Garner or someone of his ilk that is a deep lying playmaker to play alongside the BBM or BWM.
There was little point of having two technical AM's ahead of Yates in the last ten if all they were going to do was go wide and float in crosses to the far post.
Reply


Forum Jump: