Discuss Daniel Taylor's Thoughts

[Marinakis Red]

Fair enough MR. I appreciate your reply. Have these staff who have left been replaced by better? Were they doing their jobs correctly?

I won't pretend that I don't know anything about this because I do but I am interested in other peoples views on it.

Some have not been replaced at all, some have left due to working conditions and the low mood around the club seeking a new job elsewhere and some have been replaced by better equipped people. 

So there is balance in there. And some decisions for the better of the club. 

What are you thoughts on it? I'd be interested to hear.

[Sniffer Dog (Admin)]

Sounds about right to Me MR what you said above. It's like every other business really, nothing unusual.

[PsychoStooge]

Fair enough MR. I appreciate your reply. Have these staff who have left been replaced by better? Were they doing their jobs correctly?

I won't pretend that I don't know anything about this because I do but I am interested in other peoples views on it.

Some have not been replaced at all, some have left due to working conditions and the low mood around the club seeking a new job elsewhere and some have been replaced by better equipped people. 

So there is balance in there. And some decisions for the better of the club. 

What are you thoughts on it? I'd be interested to hear.

Can I just use this post as an example of what I don't like about what Taylor says on Twitter, he's clearly very informed etc. but when he talks about this stuff he only ever mentions the negatives, your post says there is balance but you don't see that from him, you don't see that some have been replaced by people who are better equipt, you don't see that some have moved on to bigger and better jobs all you see is him saying "a lot of people have left because of the poor work environment".

[Sniffer Dog (Admin)]

Agreed ^^

[ozzyten10]

There are always two sides to the story. Some are thriving in the new environment some not so much. What is indisputable is that we pay our bills on time and in general things run more smoothly than under fawaz -and even doughty (grosicki aside).

The main thing for me is that after year on year improvement - the implosion after first lockdown has seen the for first time people looking at what is going on above the football team. Some stories are not current but get all banged into the current narrative.

I am reliably informed that despite stories to the contrary - IV is trying to adapt and has been much more approachable and appreciative of others views.

[Tricky]

I am reliably informed that despite stories to the contrary - IV is trying to adapt and has been much more approachable and appreciative of others views.

Long may that approach continue  :shy:

[audiosmee]

I think Gary Brazil role might be testament to that- how much is that ethos part of the grand scheme though?

[Dog and Bear]

Fair enough MR. I appreciate your reply. Have these staff who have left been replaced by better? Were they doing their jobs correctly?

I won't pretend that I don't know anything about this because I do but I am interested in other peoples views on it.

Some have not been replaced at all, some have left due to working conditions and the low mood around the club seeking a new job elsewhere and some have been replaced by better equipped people. 

So there is balance in there. And some decisions for the better of the club. 

What are you thoughts on it? I'd be interested to hear.

Sounds about right to Me MR what you said above. It's like every other business really, nothing unusual.

Nothing to see here then. people leave and change their jobs all the time.

[Sabricadabra]

Fair enough MR. I appreciate your reply. Have these staff who have left been replaced by better? Were they doing their jobs correctly?

I won't pretend that I don't know anything about this because I do but I am interested in other peoples views on it.

Some have not been replaced at all, some have left due to working conditions and the low mood around the club seeking a new job elsewhere and some have been replaced by better equipped people. 

So there is balance in there. And some decisions for the better of the club. 

What are you thoughts on it? I'd be interested to hear.

Can I just use this post as an example of what I don't like about what Taylor says on Twitter, he's clearly very informed etc. but when he talks about this stuff he only ever mentions the negatives, your post says there is balance but you don't see that from him, you don't see that some have been replaced by people who are better equipt, you don't see that some have moved on to bigger and better jobs all you see is him saying "a lot of people have left because of the poor work environment".

I agree. He tries to spin normal events as if they are negative and all the club’s fault.

[Strawberry Avenger]

Vrentzos re-signed Knocker and Krono for Chris.

I'd say those are two positive statements.

SA.

[Jean_claude_killy]

The Tweets that Danny made at the week end; where they actually made by him?

The ones about the new training ground, the miracle gates and getting into the PL and qualifying for Europe within 5 years.

To the best of my knowledge the Club have not made any official announcements relating to any of those things; if that is the case what is Danny banging on about?

[Tricky]

The Tweets that Danny made at the week end; where they actually made by him?

The ones about the new training ground, the miracle gates and getting into the PL and qualifying for Europe within 5 years.

To the best of my knowledge the Club have not made any official announcements relating to any of those things; if that is the case what is Danny banging on about?

To my recollection JCK (not that my memory is that good anymore), I think these were things said at the time of the take over and, if im not mistaken, were in the open letter sent out by Nicholas Randall QC.

I could be wrong mind you