02-10-2019, 12:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-11-2019, 09:45 AM by Duncan Mckenzie.)
(01-10-2019, 06:09 PM)ozzyten10 Wrote: Yes- even though nffc own the houses directly behind - they have some kind of protected status. There are a few issues with building regs too... the main stand may have to built with light in mind although modern materials may be the solution here... (I know someone at Bennoy)
I suspected things weren't going to plan. IMO (I know a little bit about these things), the planning app should have been in a couple of months ago if the idea is to start work in the summer. There's normally a lot of work to do by the Architects and other consultants between planning and start on site.
The building regs issue could possibly be the threat of fire spread over the boundary - if you're proposing to build up to a boundary there are limitations on 'unprotected areas', such as windows and construction made with combustible materials. It's to prevent fire spread like the great fire of London. The fact the club owns these buildings presumably is irrelevant in that regard.
And right to light issues are ancient laws and not easily overcome. No matter how many Councillors, fans, powerful club owners are behind a development, the planners have a legal duty to apply all planning laws which protect the amenity of the owners of the adjacent buildings. It couldn't be overcome when the current Bridgford end was built, and they're probably running into the same issues this time around.
See this link to the streetview of the Aviva stadium, which I've often thought must have been designed to overcome right to light issues.

