01-08-2024, 07:11 AM
(31-07-2024, 09:46 PM)ToryTom Wrote:(31-07-2024, 09:24 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: The huge difference is that Man Utd plan to build their new ground adjacent to the old one still within Old Trafford. Its a big industrial area with room for development.
Forest of course dont have the room and its just not possible, even a move within a few miles would seem to be impractical, pretty sure the club have looked at alternatives. So the option is Toton or some other site probably outside the City. Commercially a move would make sense but if you think that’s the only consideration in my opinion you miss the point. Personally I think that alternative strips the club of its identity and what we lose is far more than we gain.
Man City, Arsenal, West Ham, Brighton, Southampton, Leicester Derby , Sunderland all moved to bigger and better stadiums in different locations. I bet not many of their fans would regret those moves and wish to go back to their old stadiums. Why would Forest fans be any different.
Sorry but that is Dog shit ^
None of them left from an iconic location like the City Ground for a start and non of them moved to a shit tip like Toton.
You are completely missing a much bigger picture.
The love affair and the history and nostalgia etc of the CG, doesn't it mean anything to you?
Those other clubs you mentioned didn't have that.
The comparison you are trying to make is not valid and is actually a bit annoying and offensive.
Panic on the streets of London

