+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: NFFC Financial Talk (/showthread.php?tid=546)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - Fumanchew - 21-01-2024
For example it’s like us saying we’ve got sangare for 30 mil on a 5 year contract and instead of doing 5 pockets of 6mil, they were doing, 10.5 mil year one. 9 mil year two. 6 mil year 3. 3 mil year 4. 1.5 mil year 5.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - stirred - 22-01-2024
(21-01-2024, 11:09 PM)Fumanchew Wrote: For example it’s like us saying we’ve got sangare for 30 mil on a 5 year contract and instead of doing 5 pockets of 6mil, they were doing, 10.5 mil year one. 9 mil year two. 6 mil year 3. 3 mil year 4. 1.5 mil year 5.
Derby? I don't think so. They were saying he'll be worth say 10m at the end, so they only need to amortize 20m over the 5 years not 30m. That's how I understood it.
Except with the Bosman ruling that doesn't hold up...
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - ozzyten10 - 22-01-2024
Man Utd are set to lose upwards of 200m for the 3 year rolling period for next year at current rates- huge impact of poor results. Estimates put Newcastle and Chelsea on similar levels. The premier league are changing the rules for this next period.
This league is really corrupt to the core.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - wassy04 - 22-01-2024
(22-01-2024, 09:53 PM)ozzyten10 Wrote: Man Utd are set to lose upwards of 200m for the 3 year rolling period for next year at current rates- huge impact of poor results. Estimates put Newcastle and Chelsea on similar levels. The premier league are changing the rules for this next period.
This league is really corrupt to the core.
The thresholds haven't increased with inflation though which is partly why they've become tougher than intended. They've been the same since the rules began.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - ozzyten10 - 22-01-2024
Fine but why next year and not this? Also the covid scam of allowable losses is just covering this up for many clubs
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - wassy04 - 22-01-2024
(22-01-2024, 10:00 PM)ozzyten10 Wrote: Fine but why next year and not this? Also the covid scam of allowable losses is just covering this up for many clubs
Because inflation was like 10% last year and because UEFA adjusted their rules. Plus we benefitted from those covid allowable losses as much as anyone else.
We were allowed to keep a year on the accounts where we made a small loss for an extra year, definitely really helped us.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - ozzyten10 - 22-01-2024
Not to the extent these premiership clubs were getting away with. Anyway - take our medicine and hope the dose is proportional to the crime.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - Reds73 - 22-01-2024
(22-01-2024, 11:14 PM)ozzyten10 Wrote: Not to the extent these premiership clubs were getting away with. Anyway - take our medicine and hope the dose is proportional to the crime.
De Marco will get us sorted.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - BomberBowyer - 23-01-2024
Something that has got me thinking about the Johnson sale after reading some comments. Was he actually fit to sell on the 30/6? Wasn’t he injured at the start of preseason with an ankle injury and unable to play and was in light training only? I think some suggested at the time it may be a ruse as we were expecting to sell him. If recall correctly he was only 50/50 for the first league game. Could it be that he wouldn’t have been able to pass a medical or clubs wouldn’t have signed him at that point? Yes I’m clutching at straws but maybe that is a further mitigating factor?
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - wassy04 - 23-01-2024
(23-01-2024, 07:40 AM)BomberBowyer Wrote: Something that has got me thinking about the Johnson sale after reading some comments. Was he actually fit to sell on the 30/6? Wasn’t he injured at the start of preseason with an ankle injury and unable to play and was in light training only? I think some suggested at the time it may be a ruse as we were expecting to sell him. If recall correctly he was only 50/50 for the first league game. Could it be that he wouldn’t have been able to pass a medical or clubs wouldn’t have signed him at that point? Yes I’m clutching at straws but maybe that is a further mitigating factor?
Would that not work against us if he was injured as we couldn't sell him therefore invalidating our claim we could've sold him?
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 23-01-2024
(23-01-2024, 08:32 AM)wassy04 Wrote:(23-01-2024, 07:40 AM)BomberBowyer Wrote: Something that has got me thinking about the Johnson sale after reading some comments. Was he actually fit to sell on the 30/6? Wasn’t he injured at the start of preseason with an ankle injury and unable to play and was in light training only? I think some suggested at the time it may be a ruse as we were expecting to sell him. If recall correctly he was only 50/50 for the first league game. Could it be that he wouldn’t have been able to pass a medical or clubs wouldn’t have signed him at that point? Yes I’m clutching at straws but maybe that is a further mitigating factor?
Would that not work against us if he was injured as we couldn't sell him therefore invalidating our claim we could've sold him?
There is nothing in the rules that says that you cannot sell an injured player.
RE: NFFC Financial Talk - Salvatore Matrecano - 23-01-2024
(23-01-2024, 08:54 AM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote:(23-01-2024, 08:32 AM)wassy04 Wrote:(23-01-2024, 07:40 AM)BomberBowyer Wrote: Something that has got me thinking about the Johnson sale after reading some comments. Was he actually fit to sell on the 30/6? Wasn’t he injured at the start of preseason with an ankle injury and unable to play and was in light training only? I think some suggested at the time it may be a ruse as we were expecting to sell him. If recall correctly he was only 50/50 for the first league game. Could it be that he wouldn’t have been able to pass a medical or clubs wouldn’t have signed him at that point? Yes I’m clutching at straws but maybe that is a further mitigating factor?
Would that not work against us if he was injured as we couldn't sell him therefore invalidating our claim we could've sold him?
There is nothing in the rules that says that you cannot sell an injured player.
Omar Richards likes this post.