Nottingham Forest - Tottenham

[Spangles]

We were shafted basically.

[Paplane]

We were shafted basically.

Yep, file this one under shafted.

[Salvatore Matrecano]

We were shafted basically.

Yep, file this one under shafted.

Gonna need a bigger filing cabinet

[wassy04]

Because that is the rule. The on field decision is only over ruled by a factual error. They had zero proof on a factual error so the goal should stand.
What they have done is make up the rules and then worse manipulated their rules in the post match review process.

It's not the rule, they have made clear what the rules are in cases like this. Just because this wasn't something that was widely known, it doesn't mean they weren't the rules.

VAR and PGMOL or whatever they are called, are clearly terrible, I just don't think the handball part of this is one of those instances.

It makes no sense to side with the ref that clearly had an obstructed view by Neco's body when they have better evidence to make a call on. Just because the evidence wasn't conclusive, doesn't mean they should stick to the guess by the ref.

We have been at worst hard done by but not shafted. Utd were shafted on Sunday, we were not (aside from the kick in the head part)

[Paplane]

I don't think you can give a pen for a kick in the head when the players head is at knee/waist height.

Neco should have manned up and knobbed it into the net. 

[wassy04]

I don't think you can give a pen for a kick in the head when the players head is at knee/waist height.

Neco should have manned up and knobbed it into the net. 

Not for high foot, just for booting him. If he'd booted him int he chest be a pen also surely?