Nottingham Forest - Wolves
#85
Booos really?

That's disappointing
Reply
#86
We never make things easy for ourselves- 16 chances. Can't see wolves being as bad second half.
Reply
#87
Wolves are pretty bad, perhaps we need to get Jesus on up top as well as Lucca
Reply
#88
Yeah I'd be tempted, don't think we need Sanguare today
Reply
#89
Feels like one of those games where we are not going to score.....

then Wolves nick a lucky one consigning Dyche to the managerial trash can.
Reply
#90
I think Jesus and maybe Ndoye on 60 mins for Lucca and Hutchinson if we still haven’t scored.

We really need to win this. I’d take a 1-0 win now
Reply
#91
Not a single decent cross in to the box, very one dimensional in our play, why are we not running with the ball into the box as we get a penalty (only wat we might score tonight) lack of intensity with slow build ups.
Reply
#92
sad to say Lucca has fluffed two of his lines.
Reply
#93
(11-02-2026, 09:21 PM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: Not a single decent cross in to the box, very one dimensional in our play, why are we not running with the ball into the box as we get a penalty (only wat we might score tonight) lack of intensity with slow build ups.

Except for the Anderson cross that MGW missed, or whoever squared it for the first Lucca miss or MGW crossing for Lucca to miss again.
Reply
#94
I think Dyche goes if we don't win.... EM looks in a real bad mood. Already kicked the TV when Lucca skied it at the end of the 6 on 1 chance.
Reply
#95
(11-02-2026, 09:23 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(11-02-2026, 09:21 PM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: Not a single decent cross in to the box, very one dimensional in our play, why are we not running with the ball into the box as we get a penalty (only wat we might score tonight) lack of intensity with slow build ups.

Except for the Anderson cross that MGW missed, or whoever squared it for the first Lucca miss or MGW crossing for Lucca to miss again.

People seeing what they want to see, it's been reasonable on the attacking front and be no complaints if MGW and Lucca had scored very reasonable chances (id say sitters)
Reply
#96
(11-02-2026, 09:28 PM)DeesideRed Wrote:
(11-02-2026, 09:23 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(11-02-2026, 09:21 PM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: Not a single decent cross in to the box, very one dimensional in our play, why are we not running with the ball into the box as we get a penalty (only wat we might score tonight) lack of intensity with slow build ups.

Except for the Anderson cross that MGW missed, or whoever squared it for the first Lucca miss or MGW crossing for Lucca to miss again.

People seeing what they want to see, it's been reasonable on the attacking front and be no complaints if MGW and Lucca had scored very reasonable chances (id say sitters)

The MGW one and the Lucca first one were as easy as they come (except Palmer last night)
Reply


Forum Jump: