Sean Dyche, Stoney And Woany
(16-01-2026, 03:52 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote: Salvatore MatrecanoGlasner is available then. Be surprised if he ends up here.

Que the tweets on x to miltadis no doubt to bring him in  :Funny:

Glasner will get a far bigger job than ours.
Reply
(16-01-2026, 03:52 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote: Salvatore MatrecanoGlasner is available then. Be surprised if he ends up here.

Que the tweets on x to miltadis no doubt to bring him in  :Funny:

Glasner will get a far bigger job than ours.

I appreciate that. It was a tongue in cheek comment knowing what some of our fanbase are like. Already tweets saying make the call Marinakis! :Up Yours:
[quote pid="264562" dateline="1768579781"]
(16-01-2026, 03:52 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote: Salvatore MatrecanoGlasner is available then. Be surprised if he ends up here.

Que the tweets on x to miltadis no doubt to bring him in  :Funny:

Glasner will get a far bigger job than ours.
[/quote]

I appreciate that. It was a tongue in cheek comment knowing what some of our fanbase are like. Already tweets saying make the call Marinakis!

[quote pid="264562" dateline="1768579781"]
(16-01-2026, 03:52 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote: Salvatore MatrecanoGlasner is available then. Be surprised if he ends up here.

Que the tweets on x to miltadis no doubt to bring him in  :Funny:

Glasner will get a far bigger job than ours.
[/quote]

I appreciate that. It was a tongue in cheek comment knowing what some of our fanbase are like. Already tweets saying make the call Marinakis!
[quote pid="264562" dateline="1768579781"]
(16-01-2026, 03:52 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote: Salvatore MatrecanoGlasner is available then. Be surprised if he ends up here.

Que the tweets on x to miltadis no doubt to bring him in  :Funny:

Glasner will get a far bigger job than ours.
[/quote]

I appreciate that. It was a tongue in cheek comment knowing what some of our fanbase are like. Already tweets saying make the call Marinakis!
Reply
(16-01-2026, 03:48 PM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: Why do most on the forum seem to want Siilva should we make a change at the end of this season, we should be looking now at potential upcoming young posibilites ready to move if this is the route EM wants us go down in the future?

It is not the case that most want him but it's the case that many think that he is the most likely.

Reply
(16-01-2026, 07:32 PM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 03:48 PM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: Why do most on the forum seem to want Siilva should we make a change at the end of this season, we should be looking now at potential upcoming young posibilites ready to move if this is the route EM wants us go down in the future?

It is not the case that most want him but it's the case that many think that he is the most likely.

100%
For me I’m not sure what he brings that Nuno for instance couldn’t.  Fulham have been fairly consistent under him but not really pushed on. Everton he struggled at but then so have many others. The only reason I think he ends up here is because he’s managed for EM before, EM appears to rate hime and they seem to get on well. Also the fact that had it not been for the high amount of compensation we’d have had to pay Fulham I think Silva would have followed Ange and not Dyche.
Reply
(16-01-2026, 07:46 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:32 PM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 03:48 PM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: Why do most on the forum seem to want Siilva should we make a change at the end of this season, we should be looking now at potential upcoming young posibilites ready to move if this is the route EM wants us go down in the future?

It is not the case that most want him but it's the case that many think that he is the most likely.
100%
For me I’m not sure what he brings that Nuno for instance couldn’t.  Fulham have been fairly consistent under him but not really pushed on. Everton he struggled at but then so have many others. The only reason I think he ends up here is because he’s managed for EM before, EM appears to rate hime and they seem to get on well. Also the fact that had it not been for the high amount of compensation we’d have had to pay Fulham I think Silva would have followed Ange and not Dyche.

We have spent more giving Nuno a 3 yr contract then paying off him and his staff, appointing Ange and his staff on a 2 yr contract and sacking them, and then appointing Dyche and co for 2 years.
Reply
(16-01-2026, 10:52 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:46 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:32 PM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 03:48 PM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: Why do most on the forum seem to want Siilva should we make a change at the end of this season, we should be looking now at potential upcoming young posibilites ready to move if this is the route EM wants us go down in the future?

It is not the case that most want him but it's the case that many think that he is the most likely.
100%
For me I’m not sure what he brings that Nuno for instance couldn’t.  Fulham have been fairly consistent under him but not really pushed on. Everton he struggled at but then so have many others. The only reason I think he ends up here is because he’s managed for EM before, EM appears to rate hime and they seem to get on well. Also the fact that had it not been for the high amount of compensation we’d have had to pay Fulham I think Silva would have followed Ange and not Dyche.

We have spent more giving Nuno a 3 yr contract then paying off him and his staff, appointing Ange and his staff on a 2 yr contract and sacking them, and then appointing Dyche and co for 2 years.

We didn’t pay Nuno off.
He got a new job a few weeks after leaving !
Reply
(16-01-2026, 11:28 PM)Reds73 Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 10:52 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:46 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:32 PM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 03:48 PM)JollyLollyAussie Wrote: Why do most on the forum seem to want Siilva should we make a change at the end of this season, we should be looking now at potential upcoming young posibilites ready to move if this is the route EM wants us go down in the future?

It is not the case that most want him but it's the case that many think that he is the most likely.
100%
For me I’m not sure what he brings that Nuno for instance couldn’t.  Fulham have been fairly consistent under him but not really pushed on. Everton he struggled at but then so have many others. The only reason I think he ends up here is because he’s managed for EM before, EM appears to rate hime and they seem to get on well. Also the fact that had it not been for the high amount of compensation we’d have had to pay Fulham I think Silva would have followed Ange and not Dyche.

We have spent more giving Nuno a 3 yr contract then paying off him and his staff, appointing Ange and his staff on a 2 yr contract and sacking them, and then appointing Dyche and co for 2 years.
We didn’t pay Nuno off.
He got a new job a few weeks after leaving !

We will have paid Nuno and his staff significant sums to break their contracts. Ange is estimated to have cost us £4m in compensation, he probably had a signing on fee, he was getting £5m/yr at Tottenham. You are talking about parting company with Dyche a year early, that effectively doubles his annual salary. Stone and Woan aren’t here for free either.

Add all that little lot up and we will have spent the same amount as the rumoured £10m release fee for Silva.
Reply
(17-01-2026, 12:47 AM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 11:28 PM)Reds73 Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 10:52 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:46 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:32 PM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote: It is not the case that most want him but it's the case that many think that he is the most likely.
100%
For me I’m not sure what he brings that Nuno for instance couldn’t.  Fulham have been fairly consistent under him but not really pushed on. Everton he struggled at but then so have many others. The only reason I think he ends up here is because he’s managed for EM before, EM appears to rate hime and they seem to get on well. Also the fact that had it not been for the high amount of compensation we’d have had to pay Fulham I think Silva would have followed Ange and not Dyche.

We have spent more giving Nuno a 3 yr contract then paying off him and his staff, appointing Ange and his staff on a 2 yr contract and sacking them, and then appointing Dyche and co for 2 years.
We didn’t pay Nuno off.
He got a new job a few weeks after leaving !

We will have paid Nuno and his staff significant sums to break their contracts. Ange is estimated to have cost us £4m in compensation, he probably had a signing on fee, he was getting £5m/yr at Tottenham. You are talking about parting company with Dyche a year early, that effectively doubles his annual salary. Stone and Woan aren’t here for free either.

Add all that little lot up and we will have spent the same amount as the rumoured £10m release fee for Silva.

We have certainly made some costly errors. Id have much preferred us to get Silva straight in after Nuno. We should have paid the money in my view.
Reply
(17-01-2026, 12:47 AM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 11:28 PM)Reds73 Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 10:52 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:46 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:32 PM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote: It is not the case that most want him but it's the case that many think that he is the most likely.
100%
For me I’m not sure what he brings that Nuno for instance couldn’t.  Fulham have been fairly consistent under him but not really pushed on. Everton he struggled at but then so have many others. The only reason I think he ends up here is because he’s managed for EM before, EM appears to rate hime and they seem to get on well. Also the fact that had it not been for the high amount of compensation we’d have had to pay Fulham I think Silva would have followed Ange and not Dyche.

We have spent more giving Nuno a 3 yr contract then paying off him and his staff, appointing Ange and his staff on a 2 yr contract and sacking them, and then appointing Dyche and co for 2 years.
We didn’t pay Nuno off.
He got a new job a few weeks after leaving !

We will have paid Nuno and his staff significant sums to break their contracts. Ange is estimated to have cost us £4m in compensation, he probably had a signing on fee, he was getting £5m/yr at Tottenham. You are talking about parting company with Dyche a year early, that effectively doubles his annual salary. Stone and Woan aren’t here for free either.

Add all that little lot up and we will have spent the same amount as the rumoured £10m release fee for Silva.

We will never know but I don't think it's as straightforward as that. Terms such as joining a another premier league club during the payment period could reduce of stop payments and clubs probably challenge the reason for dismissal with contract clauses legally for months after dismissal. My best guess is they are either going through a legal process or made a fast settlement agreement away from the contract.
Reply
just what do stone and woan actually do ? do they affect dychball in any way ? or are they just "yes" men ?
Reply
(17-01-2026, 09:26 AM)toddy Wrote: just what do stone and woan actually do ? do they affect dychball in any way ? or are they just "yes" men ?

Woan is big on the tactics delivery, stone more a coach
Reply
(17-01-2026, 07:57 AM)Marinakis Red Wrote:
(17-01-2026, 12:47 AM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 11:28 PM)Reds73 Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 10:52 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:
(16-01-2026, 07:46 PM)BomberBowyer Wrote: 100%
For me I’m not sure what he brings that Nuno for instance couldn’t.  Fulham have been fairly consistent under him but not really pushed on. Everton he struggled at but then so have many others. The only reason I think he ends up here is because he’s managed for EM before, EM appears to rate hime and they seem to get on well. Also the fact that had it not been for the high amount of compensation we’d have had to pay Fulham I think Silva would have followed Ange and not Dyche.

We have spent more giving Nuno a 3 yr contract then paying off him and his staff, appointing Ange and his staff on a 2 yr contract and sacking them, and then appointing Dyche and co for 2 years.
We didn’t pay Nuno off.
He got a new job a few weeks after leaving !

We will have paid Nuno and his staff significant sums to break their contracts. Ange is estimated to have cost us £4m in compensation, he probably had a signing on fee, he was getting £5m/yr at Tottenham. You are talking about parting company with Dyche a year early, that effectively doubles his annual salary. Stone and Woan aren’t here for free either.

Add all that little lot up and we will have spent the same amount as the rumoured £10m release fee for Silva.

We have certainly made some costly errors. Id have much preferred us to get Silva straight in after Nuno. We should have paid the money in my view.

He didn't want to leave Fulham at that time as the season had already started.

Money was not an issue.

Reply


Forum Jump: