Posts: 2,234
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation:
19
I thought UEFA had us in their website as in the Europa league? I just looked and it has Palace in the Europa league and us in the conference league playoffs.
Probably nothing but it thought they had already made the switch in their website.
Posts: 12,248
Threads: 40
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
67
17-07-2025, 10:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-07-2025, 10:55 PM by Sausage Roll.)
(17-07-2025, 10:45 PM)stirred Wrote: I thought UEFA had us in their website as in the Europa league? I just looked and it has Palace in the Europa league and us in the conference league playoffs.
Probably nothing but it thought they had already made the switch in their website.
Some Palace fan posted a screenshot of the Europa League app which still showed them but it may not have been updated yet.
Posts: 12,248
Threads: 40
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
67
17-07-2025, 11:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-07-2025, 11:03 PM by Sausage Roll.)
Just downloaded the app and it gives you the choice of Villa or Palace as English teams to follow, but when you click on the button to show the league stage entrants so far it just links through to that page above with us on it.
Wish Palace would get their arses into gear and make their appeal. Though with their record for getting their admin sorted it's no wonder it's taking so long.
Posts: 2,234
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation:
19
Yeah, I’m getting impatient for them to sort it out.
Posts: 12,248
Threads: 40
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
67
Hmm - this could throw a spanner in the works.
Crystal Palace’s case to be reinstated to the Europa League has been boosted by the emergence of an email sent last year by the association of clubs that runs European football with Uefa.
The European Club Association (ECA) told several multi-club ownership groups in October that the March 1 deadline, which has been used to eject Crystal Palace from the Europa League, was not set in stone.
In the email, the ECA, which is run by Nasser Al-Khelaifi, said that Uefa would allow outstanding issues to be resolved up to May 31.
Uefa announced last week that Palace were to be demoted from the Europa League because they did not resolve multi-club ownership issues relating to former shareholder John Textor, by a deadline of March 1. Uefa’s club financial control body, has been adamant that the deadline, moved earlier for this season only, is sacrosanct. However, there is mounting evidence that is not the case.
The ECA negotiates the distribution of all revenue from Uefa club competitions, with discussions between Al-Khelaifi and Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin about who earns what from the most lucrative competitions in football. As a consequence, when the ECA advises clubs on Uefa policy, as in this October 25 email, member clubs can assume that the governing body’s position is being outlined.
Posts: 261
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
2
(18-07-2025, 09:14 AM)Sausage Roll Wrote: Hmm - this could throw a spanner in the works.
Crystal Palace’s case to be reinstated to the Europa League has been boosted by the emergence of an email sent last year by the association of clubs that runs European football with Uefa.
The European Club Association (ECA) told several multi-club ownership groups in October that the March 1 deadline, which has been used to eject Crystal Palace from the Europa League, was not set in stone.
In the email, the ECA, which is run by Nasser Al-Khelaifi, said that Uefa would allow outstanding issues to be resolved up to May 31.
Uefa announced last week that Palace were to be demoted from the Europa League because they did not resolve multi-club ownership issues relating to former shareholder John Textor, by a deadline of March 1. Uefa’s club financial control body, has been adamant that the deadline, moved earlier for this season only, is sacrosanct. However, there is mounting evidence that is not the case.
The ECA negotiates the distribution of all revenue from Uefa club competitions, with discussions between Al-Khelaifi and Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin about who earns what from the most lucrative competitions in football. As a consequence, when the ECA advises clubs on Uefa policy, as in this October 25 email, member clubs can assume that the governing body’s position is being outlined. If they told CP that by email it probably went to the same email address that Steve Parish claimed he didnt see any other of the reminder emails either.
Posts: 10,850
Threads: 56
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
59
(18-07-2025, 09:14 AM)Sausage Roll Wrote: Hmm - this could throw a spanner in the works.
Crystal Palace’s case to be reinstated to the Europa League has been boosted by the emergence of an email sent last year by the association of clubs that runs European football with Uefa.
The European Club Association (ECA) told several multi-club ownership groups in October that the March 1 deadline, which has been used to eject Crystal Palace from the Europa League, was not set in stone.
In the email, the ECA, which is run by Nasser Al-Khelaifi, said that Uefa would allow outstanding issues to be resolved up to May 31.
Uefa announced last week that Palace were to be demoted from the Europa League because they did not resolve multi-club ownership issues relating to former shareholder John Textor, by a deadline of March 1. Uefa’s club financial control body, has been adamant that the deadline, moved earlier for this season only, is sacrosanct. However, there is mounting evidence that is not the case.
The ECA negotiates the distribution of all revenue from Uefa club competitions, with discussions between Al-Khelaifi and Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin about who earns what from the most lucrative competitions in football. As a consequence, when the ECA advises clubs on Uefa policy, as in this October 25 email, member clubs can assume that the governing body’s position is being outlined.
Did they meet the 31st May deadline? A quick google suggests that still didn't happen until June.
Or is starting the process of a sale sufficient.
This would be the worst possible result if Palace are reinstated and we've just taken a load of flak for absolutely nothing.
Posts: 756
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2023
Reputation:
16
Location: Nottingham
(18-07-2025, 09:29 AM)wassy04 Wrote: (18-07-2025, 09:14 AM)Sausage Roll Wrote: Hmm - this could throw a spanner in the works.
Crystal Palace’s case to be reinstated to the Europa League has been boosted by the emergence of an email sent last year by the association of clubs that runs European football with Uefa.
The European Club Association (ECA) told several multi-club ownership groups in October that the March 1 deadline, which has been used to eject Crystal Palace from the Europa League, was not set in stone.
In the email, the ECA, which is run by Nasser Al-Khelaifi, said that Uefa would allow outstanding issues to be resolved up to May 31.
Uefa announced last week that Palace were to be demoted from the Europa League because they did not resolve multi-club ownership issues relating to former shareholder John Textor, by a deadline of March 1. Uefa’s club financial control body, has been adamant that the deadline, moved earlier for this season only, is sacrosanct. However, there is mounting evidence that is not the case.
The ECA negotiates the distribution of all revenue from Uefa club competitions, with discussions between Al-Khelaifi and Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin about who earns what from the most lucrative competitions in football. As a consequence, when the ECA advises clubs on Uefa policy, as in this October 25 email, member clubs can assume that the governing body’s position is being outlined.
Did they meet the 31st May deadline? A quick google suggests that still didn't happen until June.
Or is starting the process of a sale sufficient.
This would be the worst possible result if Palace are reinstated and we've just taken a load of flak for absolutely nothing. Suggestions it’s irrelevant and this guy usually knows what he’s talking about.
Posts: 12,248
Threads: 40
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
67
That's a good question. If starting the process is enough then they might have a case. If it's down to when the process is completed then probably not.
And surely it would be down to when the process is completed. Sales can fall through and do all the time.
Posts: 12,248
Threads: 40
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
67
(18-07-2025, 09:32 AM)BomberBowyer Wrote: (18-07-2025, 09:29 AM)wassy04 Wrote: [quote="Sausage Roll" pid="248596" dateline="1752826449"]
Hmm - this could throw a spanner in the works.
Crystal Palace’s case to be reinstated to the Europa League has been boosted by the emergence of an email sent last year by the association of clubs that runs European football with Uefa.
The European Club Association (ECA) told several multi-club ownership groups in October that the March 1 deadline, which has been used to eject Crystal Palace from the Europa League, was not set in stone.
In the email, the ECA, which is run by Nasser Al-Khelaifi, said that Uefa would allow outstanding issues to be resolved up to May 31.
Uefa announced last week that Palace were to be demoted from the Europa League because they did not resolve multi-club ownership issues relating to former shareholder John Textor, by a deadline of March 1. Uefa’s club financial control body, has been adamant that the deadline, moved earlier for this season only, is sacrosanct. However, there is mounting evidence that is not the case.
The ECA negotiates the distribution of all revenue from Uefa club competitions, with discussions between Al-Khelaifi and Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin about who earns what from the most lucrative competitions in football. As a consequence, when the ECA advises clubs on Uefa policy, as in this October 25 email, member clubs can assume that the governing body’s position is being outlined.
Did they meet the 31st May deadline? A quick google suggests that still didn't happen until June.
Or is starting the process of a sale sufficient.
This would be the worst possible result if Palace are reinstated and we've just taken a load of flak for absolutely nothing.
[/quote
Suggestions it’s irrelevant and this guy usually knows what he’s talking about.
Ah, that sounds more promising. And as one of the replies to that email said - Palace can't argue they're not in an MCO all the time then just suddenly decide to be in one for that email.
Posts: 10,850
Threads: 56
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
59
In reality Textor got out long before the season started, it's such a stupid rule.
Parish is a douche and should just accept they f****d up but doesn't make it not a silly rule.
30th June would be a much more logical deadline to correct these things, would stop you having to set up needless blind trusts then.
Posts: 756
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2023
Reputation:
16
Location: Nottingham
(18-07-2025, 09:38 AM)wassy04 Wrote: In reality Textor got out long before the season started, it's such a stupid rule.
Parish is a douche and should just accept they f****d up but doesn't make it not a silly rule.
30th June would be a much more logical deadline to correct these things, would stop you having to set up needless blind trusts then.
Agreed. And I know it won’t happen and in many ways why should it given the additional revenue, higher standing, ability to attract better players etc but part of me would quite like Forest to publicly ask what the possibility is for us to stay in the Conference League and what that might mean for Palace. I’d imagine if we stay in the Conference and Palace’s appeal isn’t upheld then they’d be out of Europe altogether. Then we’d see how their fans react :Funny:
|
Champions League - Europa League - Conference League
