Brighton - Nottingham Forest
(29-03-2025, 10:01 PM)Colnago Wrote:
(29-03-2025, 09:33 PM)Floridared Wrote:
(29-03-2025, 09:32 PM)McDurban Wrote:
(29-03-2025, 07:42 PM)Fumanchew Wrote: It’s not accidental contact though cus mitoma tried to win the ball and failed and contacted the player by sliding in uncontrollably

This +1
If it was his foot it would've been a pen so why not his arm?

Moot point.....we won !

Not a moot point it was a stonewall peno,shocking decision, sick of listening to ex players talk shite, Upson was a utter clown on co comms

OK but it didn't affect the final result thankfully.
Reply
(29-03-2025, 10:06 PM)The reds Wrote:
(29-03-2025, 10:04 PM)Plymouth red Wrote: Do get the feeling by banging on about international travel that they were looking to make excuses for why brighton did not win.

Rubbish. They wanted Brighton to win it from the second the programme started. We kept them at arms lengths pretty much through full 120mins and we had the best chances and probably should’ve had a penalty.

Not sure why you are rubbishing my point... I'm agreeing with you. Only after the match did they go on about international travel because they wanted to avoid giving credit to forest. They are using it as an excuse for brighton losing
Reply
(29-03-2025, 10:20 PM)Plymouth red Wrote:
(29-03-2025, 10:06 PM)The reds Wrote:
(29-03-2025, 10:04 PM)Plymouth red Wrote: Do get the feeling by banging on about international travel that they were looking to make excuses for why brighton did not win.

Rubbish. They wanted Brighton to win it from the second the programme started. We kept them at arms lengths pretty much through full 120mins and we had the best chances and probably should’ve had a penalty.

Not sure why you are rubbishing my point... I'm agreeing with you. Only after the match did they go on about international travel because they wanted to avoid giving credit to forest. They are using it as an excuse for brighton losing

No rubbishing the pundits view.
Reply
The whole BBC coverage is poor. Not one of the pundits, the commentator or the co-commentator demonstrated any understanding of the way we go about things. We shut them down basically and prevented them playing through us. Brighton tried to sit back and draw us out and we completely handled it. Brighton weren't jaded, they weren't having an off day, they were just beaten by a better side who were tactically better.
Reply
Just looked at the highlights of the celebrations was there a Brighton fan trying to get at the Forest players and was taken down to the ground by the stewards?
Reply
They barely acknowledged that we quite obviously intentionally saved Elanga and CHO to play extra time too and therefore were unlikely to create too much before then.
Reply
Incredible again from Sels.

That save in extra time.

Just wow.
Reply
And still can't work out why var got involved in the penalty. He slid in and with his arm dragged Andersons foot. Had he not jumped in, Anderson doesn't have his foot dragged.

I may be bias but the more I look at it, the more convincing it looks.

That happens to a Liverpool or City player and it stays a penalty in my humble opinion. If it happens down the other end... it stays given. In fact var doesn't get involved.
Reply
(29-03-2025, 10:49 PM)Plymouth red Wrote: And still can't work out why var got involved in the penalty. He slid in and with his arm dragged Andersons foot. Had he not jumped in, Anderson doesn't have his foot dragged.

I may be bias but the more I look at it, the more convincing it looks.

That happens to a Liverpool or City player and it stays a penalty in my humble opinion. If it happens down the other end... it stays given. In fact var doesn't get involved.

1000% it’s not even a talking point, then all the comms team start talking shite , it’s embarrassing 
His foot was took from him whichever part of the body did it
Reply
(29-03-2025, 10:55 PM)Colnago Wrote:
(29-03-2025, 10:49 PM)Plymouth red Wrote: And still can't work out why var got involved in the penalty. He slid in and with his arm dragged Andersons foot. Had he not jumped in, Anderson doesn't have his foot dragged.

I may be bias but the more I look at it, the more convincing it looks.

That happens to a Liverpool or City player and it stays a penalty in my humble opinion. If it happens down the other end... it stays given. In fact var doesn't get involved.

1000% it’s not even a talking point, then all the comms team start talking shite , it’s embarrassing 
His foot was took from him whichever part of the body did it

One of them said, his arm was in a natural position as if he handled it as opposed to taken a player out.

It was unusual and bad luck on Mitoma's part but he stopped Anderson who was through on goal. 

Also, the slow motion always makes it look like a player puts their leg towards the tackle but it looked clear he was just in the process of rolling the ball under his foot.
Reply
Youuuuuuuuuuuuuuu reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeds!!! V
100% deserved, better team. Everyone put a shift in nut I thought Elliot Anderson was absolutely superb
.
Reply
Who ever we get in the semis can we at least have an ex Forest player not a one year signing, to pundit for us and for gods sake can anyone else but Rooney fill the 3rd chair!!

I assume Pearces contract would stop him I think he was doing talksport comms today

Even if it’s Laws he maybe not be a recent crock or failed manager needing work

That or Keane or nige
Reply


Forum Jump: