01-04-2023, 09:07 PM
|
Nottingham Forest - Wolves
|
|
01-04-2023, 11:34 PM
MOTD’s coverage of us is absolutely dire yet again.
02-04-2023, 12:07 AM
(01-04-2023, 09:07 PM)wassy04 Wrote:(01-04-2023, 09:04 PM)Madforit Wrote: We played well and until Cooper bottled it and made those changes, I couldn't really see them getting anything from that game. Yes that Cooper is so rubbish. What did he ever do for us.
02-04-2023, 07:42 AM
Positives
- First half outplayed and dominated Wolves. - Looked relatively untroubled at back 1st half. - Dwarf midfield played some nice stuff. - Created so many chances and great attacking opportunities. - We've finally found another team who genuinely look to be struggling more than us. - MGW better than anything they had that doesn't spit. - 2nd half we played a classic counter attacking game. - Return of Taiwo. - Danilo looks a player. - We are 14th!! Negatives - We got one point, deserved 3. - First part of 2nd half we were struggling to get the ball. - Any danger Wolves mustered came down both full back channels. - (controversial one this) some people's response after we conceded blaming the change of shape? At the game we felt they were targeting those areas and were saying we needed another CB once they went 3 up top. - The missed opportunities. Some clear cut chances and some very poor last pass/shoot decisions. That's what really cost us if we're honest. - Thought Felipe was superb but his shanked 50p header was the first mistake and lead directly to goal. I genuinely think they would have created more against us and potentially scored earlier if we hadn't adjusted and clearly we seemed incapable of finishing them off on the break. At half time I begged for a clean sheet, but it never came. Saw Dirtyleeds result and thought they might be on a downer but then MOTD highlights showed them creating 3 good chances at Arsenal at 0-0....gulp
02-04-2023, 08:44 AM
02-04-2023, 08:48 AM
Just watched the terrible MOTD coverage.
One take away - could Navas have stood up for their equaliser? Seemed to go to ground too soon for me …..
02-04-2023, 09:09 AM
As people have said, the chances we created is a massive plus. I'm not on Dennis' back for not squaring, the replay shows that when he cuts inside Kilman was running past MGW when Dennis looks so doesn't look on.
My opinion is the subs was overly negative especially when we were regularly breaking on them and 2-0 looked more likely than 1-1 at that point. Taiwo would have made sense
02-04-2023, 09:11 AM
(01-04-2023, 07:11 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:(01-04-2023, 06:48 PM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote: Not trying to be funny here it is a serious question. VAR confirmed nothing came out. Brennan reaction was nowhere near what it would have been had he been spat on
02-04-2023, 09:18 AM
(02-04-2023, 09:11 AM)DeesideRed Wrote:(01-04-2023, 07:11 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote:(01-04-2023, 06:48 PM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote: Not trying to be funny here it is a serious question. He certainly made what looked like a clear spitting motion. Is intent to spit sufficient for a ban?
02-04-2023, 09:19 AM
Tbf they've lost Neves now for 2 games which will be a big blow in 2 home games.
02-04-2023, 10:46 AM
Dont know why Podence didnt start for them. From what ive seen he's one of their best players.
02-04-2023, 11:41 AM
(02-04-2023, 12:07 AM)Jacksbadhobbits Wrote:(01-04-2023, 09:07 PM)wassy04 Wrote:(01-04-2023, 09:04 PM)Madforit Wrote: We played well and until Cooper bottled it and made those changes, I couldn't really see them getting anything from that game. We were doing OK until those changes, they never looked like they were going to score, literally making those changes cost us two points. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|

