Huddersfield - Nottingham Forest
#37
Zinc has a slight injury and will be OK for next week
Reply
#38
Looks like Reid is going for a solid 0-0 away from home - 8 at the back and leave 3 up top just in case we get the ball.


"Are you Hughton in disguise...............are you in Hughton in disguise.........."
Reply
#39
[Image: E-kb-DOr-XMAA-8-Z8.jpg]

The Opposition.......
Reply
#40
Figs preferred over Soh? Cmonnnn what do people still see in him?
Reply
#41
Mmm, I like the look of this but also very concerned that we were absolutely pants with a back 3 under Sabri on the few occasions we tried it.

Makes sense now why the additional CB came in last week.
Reply
#42
Had to tell what to make of that line up... seems ultra defensive but you never know it might just confuse everyone enough to allow isn’t sneak a win
Reply
#43
(18-09-2021, 02:15 PM)Fumanchew Wrote: Figs preferred over Soh? Cmonnnn what do people still see in him?

Think he'll be ok with 2 others CBs alongside him. He heads it and kicks it, now he can leave the rest to the others.

Mbe Sow being punished for a poor performance on Wednesday? I suppose there's no point in having a competitive squad if players arent dropped after a poor peformance.
Reply
#44
(18-09-2021, 02:20 PM)Uwantlee Wrote: Had to tell what to make of that line up... seems ultra defensive but you never know it might just confuse everyone enough to allow isn’t sneak a win

3 at the back doesnt equate to defensive. Its just fluid. 5 at the back when defending, 3 when attacking. Can be very effective.
Reply
#45
(18-09-2021, 02:09 PM)JWJW Wrote: Looks like Reid is going for a solid 0-0 away from home - 8 at the back and leave 3 up top just in case we get the ball.


"Are you Hughton in disguise...............are you in Hughton in disguise.........."  (But most of the Championship is Hughton in disguise?  Alot of it looks very 'agricultural' to me.)

3 up front instead of 1.  (With the 'attacking?' wing backs to join in to make it '5'.)

4 in midfield instead of '2'.

And an extra CH at the back.

We'll see if the re-shuffle can 'press' (that will keep Garibaldi Red happy...)

SA.
Reply
#46
(18-09-2021, 02:21 PM)Paplane Wrote:
(18-09-2021, 02:15 PM)Fumanchew Wrote: Figs preferred over Soh? Cmonnnn what do people still see in him?

Think he'll be ok with 2 others CBs alongside him. He heads it and kicks it, now he can leave the rest to the others.

Mbe Sow being punished for a poor performance on Wednesday? I suppose there's no point in having a competitive squad if players arent dropped after a poor peformance.

Surely he shouldn’t be punished for playing out of position, if it was gonna be an attritional game then why not get some battle harden experience into Back again?
Reply
#47
(18-09-2021, 02:28 PM)Fumanchew Wrote:
(18-09-2021, 02:21 PM)Paplane Wrote:
(18-09-2021, 02:15 PM)Fumanchew Wrote: Figs preferred over Soh? Cmonnnn what do people still see in him?

Think he'll be ok with 2 others CBs alongside him. He heads it and kicks it, now he can leave the rest to the others.

Mbe Sow being punished for a poor performance on Wednesday? I suppose there's no point in having a competitive squad if players arent dropped after a poor peformance.

Surely he shouldn’t be punished for playing out of position, if it was gonna be an attritional game then why not get some battle harden experience into Back again?

Interesting that the 'temporary' manager has put Horvath and Soh (both involved in the clanger) onto the bench.

Car' is not 'on' the bench, either.

But we do get the 'much asked for' 3 at the back.

SA.
Reply
#48
Grabbbbaaaaaannnnnn diving header
0-1
Reply


Forum Jump: