Poll: Hughton In or Out?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
IN
26.67%
20 26.67%
OUT
73.33%
55 73.33%
Total 75 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Right Lads Lets Get Straight To It
#85
(22-08-2021, 08:12 AM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: Murphy has been here more than a month. He had already been working before he was officially announced.

He officially left Barnsley back in June then went to the States for a bit
"It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time, it's Trickay, It's Tricky, Tricky, Tricky Tricky" - Run DMC
Reply
#86
He ceased to be a director at Barnsley with effect from 1st July.

I doubt he would have breached his fiduciary duties to Barnsley prior to that date.

Pretty serious allegation.
Reply
#87
Even your precious mate Dan Taylor said that he had been working before he was announced. Also he can work from The States you know. It's 2021 now.

And who said he started working while he was still at Barnsley? I said that he had been working before he was announced.
Panic on the streets of London
Reply
#88
(22-08-2021, 08:30 AM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: Even your precious mate Dan Taylor said that he had been working before he was announced. Also he can work from The States you know. It's 2021 now.

And who said he started working while he was still at Barnsley? I said that he had been working before he was announced.

The big man from Greece is ultimately responsible.

Hopefully with the new back room staff things will change. But blaming a man who has been here a few weeks is ridiculous.
Reply
#89
(22-08-2021, 08:30 AM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: Even your precious mate Dan Taylor said that he had been working before he was announced. Also he can work from The States you know. It's 2021 now.

And who said he started working while he was still at Barnsley? I said that he had been working before he was announced.

What we saying then. Six weeks, eight weeks and this is the man responsible for the current debacle. Who is responsible for the run of 2 wins out of 14 at the end of last season or the pathetic goals return last season and tirgid performances in every game last season. Are we seriously saying Murphy is accountable for this mess in the few weeks he has been employed at the club. I can’t believe anybody seriously believes that.
Reply
#90
(22-08-2021, 08:48 AM)Georgecloney Wrote:
(22-08-2021, 08:30 AM)Sniffer Dog Wrote: Even your precious mate Dan Taylor said that he had been working before he was announced. Also he can work from The States you know. It's 2021 now.

And who said he started working while he was still at Barnsley? I said that he had been working before he was announced.

What we saying then. Six weeks, eight weeks and this is the man responsible for the current debacle. Who is responsible for the run of 2 wins out of 14 at the end of last season or the pathetic goals return last season and tirgid performances in every game last season. Are we seriously saying Murphy is accountable for this mess in the few weeks he has been employed at the club. I can’t believe anybody seriously believes that.

Where have I said that Dane is responsible :huh: 

Confused.
Panic on the streets of London
Reply
#91
(19-08-2021, 11:50 AM)Jsmed Wrote: Voted out after last night. Enough is enough. This reminds me of when we had O’Neill in charge. We are going nowhere.

Winning eight games during his time in charge, including the final three games of the season and an East Midlands derby, the two-time European Cup winning player can boast the joint-third best win ratio in the club's rich history.

Based on that statistic alone, only Billy Davies since the turn of the millennium has proved as successful in charge as the 67-year-old, who during his short time back at the club won as many games as Ron Atkinson and Steve McClaren combined

With Keane as his no2 there was also a natural succession, continuity and all that sort of stuff

So you justify Hughton's absolute shit show for 45 games like many on here, relentlessly dressing up mediocrity and predictability and generally diabolical, possibly the most diabolical in the clubs history and have the nerve to slate M O N and Roy Keane who had no window, no transfer budget 

Best win ratio's of former Nottingham Forest managers (ten games or more):

Brian Clough - 46.2%

Dave Bassett - 42.9%


Martin O'Neill - 42.1%
Reply
#92
MON was also the last manager I remember who was willing to change from 4231 that AK, SL, and CH and all reluctant to change.
Reply
#93
(22-08-2021, 03:15 PM)optimistic_red Wrote: MON was also the last manager I remember who was willing to change from 4231 that AK, SL, and CH and all reluctant to change.

SL was 41221 essentially rather than 4231.
Reply
#94
(22-08-2021, 11:03 AM)PsychoStanleyStone Wrote:
(19-08-2021, 11:50 AM)Jsmed Wrote: Voted out after last night. Enough is enough. This reminds me of when we had O’Neill in charge. We are going nowhere.

Winning eight games during his time in charge, including the final three games of the season and an East Midlands derby, the two-time European Cup winning player can boast the joint-third best win ratio in the club's rich history.

Based on that statistic alone, only Billy Davies since the turn of the millennium has proved as successful in charge as the 67-year-old, who during his short time back at the club won as many games as Ron Atkinson and Steve McClaren combined

With Keane as his no2 there was also a natural succession, continuity and all that sort of stuff

So you justify Hughton's absolute S**t show for 45 games like many on here, relentlessly dressing up mediocrity and predictability and generally diabolical, possibly the most diabolical in the clubs history and have the nerve to slate M O N and Roy Keane who had no window, no transfer budget 

Best win ratio's of former Nottingham Forest managers (ten games or more):

Brian Clough - 46.2%

Dave Bassett - 42.9%


Martin O'Neill - 42.1%

MoN was shafted.  Shabbily treated.  And the hubris of last season and the season ending before it came home to roost.  Looks like the club backed the mediocre recruitment instead of a true reds legend who would have taken us through the pain barrier and through the other side.  Instead?  We're seeing the light too late, again.  Sure the football would have been pugilistic.  But this is the Championship.  And we don't have parachute payments.  He got little time.  Half a season is nothing.  Again.  no Summer recruitment.  He didn't get to have one!  Shocking treatment.

And Hughton might be next.  Two Summers.  And how many permanent signings has he made?

Both have the ignominy of being poorly backed when almost all the other pretenders had a raft of players at their disposal (and still got disposed of in the end.)

When we get good managers or they get into good positions?  We don't back them.  Hart.  Davies with the whole LB saga.

SA.
Reply
#95
(22-08-2021, 03:15 PM)optimistic_red Wrote: MON was also the last manager I remember who was willing to change from 4231 that AK, SL, and CH and all reluctant to change.

Reluctant?  Had to play 3 at the back (mentioned by Hughton) if you don't have fit CHs.

SA.
Reply


Forum Jump: