Nottingham Forest v Reading - Predictions

[Tricky]

The scoring, to be totally perfect and clever and in harmony with nature really has to be based on the Fibonacci scale, which starts 0, 1. 1. 2, 3. 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987 ...

The benefit here being that the Fibonacci scale also relates to shapes and music so instead of just looking at the pure biggest number your results can be plotted onto graph paper to form shapes and even into music or if you like there is a poetic structure based on Fibonacci mathematical scale.  Just saying.

:huh: :dodgy:

[Sniffer Dog (Admin)]

I think we should do whatever Frochy tells us to do. End of  :)

[Paplane]

At the end of the day, seeing as we have started this league quite a way into the season, I am using this season as a trial, then rolling it out fully next season proper. So there will be changes made from time to time

A lot of it is a bit hit and miss at the moment, until we can find the correct balance, that everyone is happy with.

I am open to any suggestions people may have about how to improve things, as well as any constructive criticism along the way.

This isn't 'my' league, it is the COYR Forum league, I have only taken it on to get it up and running and to update it on a weekly basis, which I am more than happy to do so, therefore everyone is entitled to comment, make suggestions etc until such time that we can publish a full set of rules so we all know what is going on and start it proper at the start of next season.  :huh:

So please anyone who is unsure about something, or doesn't like something about how it is being done presently, please make your feelings known now, so it can be looked into and remedied if needs be  :shy:

My suggestion Tricky is keep it simple chap. Just go for a full time score, for say 3 points, then a give single point to people who predicted an incorrect score but got the result right.

[PsychoStanleyStone]

 it is a bit hit and miss at the moment

Just go for a full time score, for say 3 points, then a give single point to people who predicted an incorrect score but got the result right.

Pap, this reminds me of a Stan Laurel quote ''If you want me to leave I'll stay as long as you want''

it's just 1 question though Pap::  How is it possible to get 'an incorrect score' but 'get the result right', on the precursor of 'Just go for a full time score'?

Tricky .... definately