For me one of the problems, is that nobody know who the chief Exec is, he doesn’t do interviews, he doesn’t provide any open letters, it feels like he has been protected by the club and media (and including Daniel Taylor in that) but seems like it has come to the point to look at his involvement and how he is running the club and is working on The Marinakis Manifesto
If you look at what Marinakis wanted and what has been delivered, then after 3.5 years the CEO has failed. During the Greeks reign we are on our 5th Manager, signed 70 odd players, had different coaches, scouting teams yet the common denominator (is not the fans that some have claimed) but Vrentzos, so why cannot we questions his involvement and how he is running the club? Isn’t it time he stood up and made himself known and the direction he wants to take the club and the strategy behind it.
He shield the owners and runs the clubs from head to bottom, and the City Ground is not a happy place, continue to loses money and all positivity has been eroded.
Reminds me of Mark Arthur, the guy who safeguarded and defended Nigel Doughty, and he was the man who took a lot of the pressure and criticism from the fans (including me) he took quite a long time for fans to realise things had to change, but at least Arthur put his head above the Parapet and do interviews and attend supporters events to answer questions (even if we didn’t like the answers) but this pitbull remains on the leash and remains anonymous as do any of the C-suite / owners.
Its time for a charm offensive, and hoping we get a reaction.
But my questions are
Is it fair to question him or not?
Do you want to hear from him or happy as we are?
If you look at what Marinakis wanted and what has been delivered, then after 3.5 years the CEO has failed. During the Greeks reign we are on our 5th Manager, signed 70 odd players, had different coaches, scouting teams yet the common denominator (is not the fans that some have claimed) but Vrentzos, so why cannot we questions his involvement and how he is running the club? Isn’t it time he stood up and made himself known and the direction he wants to take the club and the strategy behind it.
He shield the owners and runs the clubs from head to bottom, and the City Ground is not a happy place, continue to loses money and all positivity has been eroded.
Reminds me of Mark Arthur, the guy who safeguarded and defended Nigel Doughty, and he was the man who took a lot of the pressure and criticism from the fans (including me) he took quite a long time for fans to realise things had to change, but at least Arthur put his head above the Parapet and do interviews and attend supporters events to answer questions (even if we didn’t like the answers) but this pitbull remains on the leash and remains anonymous as do any of the C-suite / owners.
Its time for a charm offensive, and hoping we get a reaction.
But my questions are
Is it fair to question him or not?
Do you want to hear from him or happy as we are?
Everyone is entitled to my opinion - COYR :)