Controversial Poll MON Stick Or Twist?

[Username]

There's a lot of 'should haves' regarding what the board should have done.

Aitor had a clear history of 'walking out' when the going got tough.  'Red flag.'

You buy four relative lightweights to play 'football' in the muck and nettles league.

In retrospect.  It all seems so quaint.  Even I fell for it.

They could have appointed another continental manager.  Because that worked so well with Montanier and Aitor...neither of whom I could understand post match in their interviews.  But hey, it worked for Norwich...but didn't Norwich actually back their man and stick with 'the plan' for more than a season?  The could have sacked their manager last season who finished far lower than '7th.'

A 'load of athletes' would do just fine.  Provided they can 'play a bit.'  It worked for Ferguson, it worked for Warnock.

Because tippy-tappy football worked so well under Warburton.  It was all going so 'great' until it wasn't and the board realised they wanted 'it' 'now.'

Make your mind up, hierarchy.  Which is it?

The only thing 'controversial' is if the hierarchy actually stick with MoN (or any other manager...) for more than a year.
SA.

Norwich didn’t back their man, they sold Murphy as soon as he arrived and Maddison the following summer. 

Farke has succeeded in spite of his hierarchy. 

You can’t demand eight quality signings and point to Norwich as some form of utopia. 

Farke has turned water into wine. The opposite of what you’re advocating under Martin.