14-03-2019, 02:42 PM
(14-03-2019, 02:39 PM)Paplane Wrote:(14-03-2019, 02:26 PM)Maltared Wrote:(14-03-2019, 09:29 AM)Paplane Wrote:3rd goal, he should have intercepted it, it was a dangerous cross that defenders expect their keeper to bail them out and not remain stuck on his line. Crosses like those or are intercepted by the keeper or will end up in an own goal as the defender is facing his goal.(14-03-2019, 09:20 AM)Duncan Mckenzie Wrote:(14-03-2019, 09:04 AM)the jock Wrote: to be fair to pants for the first goal, colback shouldnt have been beaten like that was disappointing. we never got a grip
Imagine the reaction if that would have been Osborn and not Colback?
Regarding Pants, I have been saying it all season...We need a new goalkeeper in the summer.
First goal he should definitely stopped. 2nd goal the shot was excellent but he really should be doing better in my book. 3rd goal i dont think he could have done much about.
It wasnt his best night's work. Ok every player has a bad game every now and then. BUT, this is not the first night he's had a bad night.
When the pressure cranks up he goes missing.
I had their third goal down as being as a result of an excellent delivery. It had pace and direction. The 2 CB's were static. I don't think you can put that one down to him to be honest.
I got the vibe that the CHs were down for one of the goals. But, as Malta has pointed out...I think our issues started higher up the pitch...and the midfield just couldn't cope for the 1st half hour.
SA.
