19-01-2019, 10:36 PM
(19-01-2019, 10:30 PM)NG3 Wrote:(19-01-2019, 10:27 PM)PsychoStooge Wrote:(19-01-2019, 10:26 PM)NG3 Wrote:(19-01-2019, 10:22 PM)PsychoStooge Wrote: The board take the blame, simple as that. 1. Make the manager's job untenable when he's doing well. 2. Display a complete lack of bollocks after they've made his job untenable and wait 3 weeks for him to walk rather than sacking him.
I'd find out a few more facts first, just a suggestion...
Nah, made my mind up after Norwich on Boxing Day. The board take the blame for another wasted season.
So you fully admit your running with a narrative invented on social media rather than facts?
Your choice I guess
Until I'm presented with any evidence that suggests otherwise I'll continue believing the board made the managers job untenable, after someone decided to tell the media on conclusion of the game against Norwich on Boxing Day that he was going to be sacked.
