06-10-2022, 08:42 AM
(06-10-2022, 08:22 AM)Sausage Roll Wrote:(06-10-2022, 08:16 AM)Sniffer Dog (Admin) Wrote:(05-10-2022, 06:17 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Seems like we have all decided Dane was crap then. Agreed he didnt step up like he should have done this summer but I am a long way from convinced this bloke and Charnley are good news.
I think it is worth pointing out at this stage that Dane asked for help and requested that Charnley be brought into the club to help with PL match day requirements and ticketing etc. Charnley is on the business side and he is not involved on the playing side of things. Charnley role is advisory and consultancy etc on a part time basis only.
His role might change once Dane leaves but then aghain when Dane leaves Charnley might leave too. We will have to wait and see.
Question Sniff, if you know: Did Murphy ask specifically for Charnley? Or just for help and EM appointed Charnley?
I just find it interesting because, as you said (and it's more on Twitter than here), it seems that every good decision is allocated to Murphy and all the bad ones to EM and son. I'm sure that can't be the case either way.
If Murphy asked for Charnley that would totally rubbish the above theory.
I have no problem with Charnely being there in a consultancy role and Murphy may indeed have asked for it. The point is there are strong rumours Murphy will leave and Charnley will take over the CEO role. Do we really want him and Giraldo effectively running the club? Does that all sound like a marriage made in heaven?