16-09-2018, 09:17 AM
(16-09-2018, 01:47 AM)NG3 Wrote:(16-09-2018, 01:28 AM)Sunny Wrote: It’s irrelevant in the sense that a new team has been brought in over the summer.
& a new one was bought last summer, & last January, & next January. That's sadly how modern football works. Leeds are currently top of the table with 10 new players & a new manager, & last season wolves were up there with 23 signings & a new manager.
Every team signs players, but it doesn't negate, nor make irrelevant Karanka's past form & results, especially when they are consistent with the current seasons.
Quote:Whether we’d won every game or lost every game last season doesn’t have a bearing on how this new team will perform.
No but would have a bearing on the managers abilities, which is what is being discussed.
You are just attempting to dismiss an inconvenient truth.
You realise that even if you dismiss that truth that in the real world it doesn't actually change anything?
The board is no more, or less likely to keep, or dismiss Karanka because you've chosen to ignore results & performances from last season, especially with regards to performances where we saw clear indications of tactics & formations, consistent with this seasons & the performances & results they have so far produced.
I’m giving my opinion. I thought that was the purpose of a forum.
The draw at Swansea was a good result in my opinion and so I don’t see it hastening a change of manager. It makes little difference to me who the manager is so long as the team clicks in the next couple of months and begins to rise up the table.
