I think AK's only real outstanding quality so far is that he can charm an owner into spending much more thoney than they usually would. I've not seen anything from him tactically to suggest he's anything better than what we've had previous (I'd say SOD & Davies could out-think him in a heartbeat, and would thrash his teams if all sets of managers had the same squads), and his "motivational" method seems to be far inferior too, relying again on money - simply "play well or be replaced".
With all that said, I think we have to stick with him, and it would be far more harmful to u-turn AGAIN. His approach is gonna be the most expensive & is probably one of the biggest gambles we've taken, but backing out & starting again could be disasterous.
For those who play Poker I feel like we've chosen to go "All In" with a pair of 10's & before seeing the flop. Not the best scenario at all, would much sooner the owners had the sense to back Kings with that money, but here we are and backing out could hurt us big time.
With all that said, I think we have to stick with him, and it would be far more harmful to u-turn AGAIN. His approach is gonna be the most expensive & is probably one of the biggest gambles we've taken, but backing out & starting again could be disasterous.
For those who play Poker I feel like we've chosen to go "All In" with a pair of 10's & before seeing the flop. Not the best scenario at all, would much sooner the owners had the sense to back Kings with that money, but here we are and backing out could hurt us big time.