+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: The Premier League 2023/24 (/showthread.php?tid=1389)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - ozzyten10 - 11-03-2024
I wonder why this has been rushed through? Would it be the fact that 10 clubs are due to fail once the covid losses are off the books?
Couldn’t write it could you. We get done whilst all other established clubs get away with changed rules. This stinks.
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - Trailer Park Tom - 11-03-2024
(11-03-2024, 07:25 PM)The reds Wrote: Looks like a new financial system could be in place by the summer, going down the uefa cost ratio route
We would be able to spend 85% of revenue on Wages and Transfers - This would definitely benefit the Big 6.
Absolutely.
I think a fair way is a consistent cap on wages and transfers but it would never happened because of agents and sky ect.
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - The reds - 11-03-2024
(11-03-2024, 07:41 PM)ozzyten10 Wrote: I wonder why this has been rushed through? Would it be the fact that 10 clubs are due to fail once the covid losses are off the books?
Couldn’t write it could you. We get done whilst all other established clubs get away with changed rules. This stinks.
Most likely, we were able to write off 5m in Covid losses in championship, PL clubs were allowed to claim 100m plus with no limit whatsoever.
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - The reds - 11-03-2024
Rumours that the Big 6 are back in talks for the super league, get them gone now.
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - willdared - 11-03-2024
(11-03-2024, 08:26 PM)The reds Wrote: Rumours that the Big 6 are back in talks for the super league, get them gone now.
Don't blame them. Can't believe this new ruling has been voted through...100% agree with what Neville said on the recent overlap, been saying the same myself for ages
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - Salvatore Matrecano - 11-03-2024
This is clearly the excuse for all charges against Man City and Chelsea to be dropped as the rule is no longer in place. But we get done this year and no-one else gives a shit.
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - Huddersz - 11-03-2024
(11-03-2024, 09:38 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: This is clearly the excuse for all charges against Man City and Chelsea to be dropped as the rule is no longer in place. But we get done this year and no-one else gives a S**t.
Can't recall where I saw it but apparently both clubs will (eventually) be charged under the current legislation.
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - stirred - 11-03-2024
(11-03-2024, 08:54 PM)willdared Wrote:(11-03-2024, 08:26 PM)The reds Wrote: Rumours that the Big 6 are back in talks for the super league, get them gone now.
Don't blame them. Can't believe this new ruling has been voted through...100% agree with what Neville said on the recent overlap, been saying the same myself for ages
What did GNev say?
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - willdared - 11-03-2024
(11-03-2024, 11:30 PM)stirred Wrote:(11-03-2024, 08:54 PM)willdared Wrote:(11-03-2024, 08:26 PM)The reds Wrote: Rumours that the Big 6 are back in talks for the super league, get them gone now.
Don't blame them. Can't believe this new ruling has been voted through...100% agree with what Neville said on the recent overlap, been saying the same myself for ages
What did GNev say?
Everyone should be allowed to spend the same amount and should be based on highest revenue club. One bit he added that I liked is clubs with smaller revenue only so much is club debt, the rest is owners money.
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - DR Forest - 12-03-2024
(11-03-2024, 07:25 PM)The reds Wrote: Looks like a new financial system could be in place by the summer, going down the uefa cost ratio route
We would be able to spend 85% of revenue on Wages and Transfers - This would definitely benefit the Big 6.
When questioned in front of the select committee about future changes to FFP, Richard Masters said categorically the current P&S rules would still be in place next season (at least).
I’ve posted the link on here before.
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - stirred - 12-03-2024
(11-03-2024, 11:43 PM)willdared Wrote:(11-03-2024, 11:30 PM)stirred Wrote:(11-03-2024, 08:54 PM)willdared Wrote:(11-03-2024, 08:26 PM)The reds Wrote: Rumours that the Big 6 are back in talks for the super league, get them gone now.
Don't blame them. Can't believe this new ruling has been voted through...100% agree with what Neville said on the recent overlap, been saying the same myself for ages
What did GNev say?
Everyone should be allowed to spend the same amount and should be based on highest revenue club. One bit he added that I liked is clubs with smaller revenue only so much is club debt, the rest is owners money.
The devil would be in the detail, but the principal of being able to spend the same amount sounds appealing in a way, isn't that what they do in F1?
RE: The Premier League 2023/24 - wassy04 - 12-03-2024
(12-03-2024, 12:36 PM)stirred Wrote:(11-03-2024, 11:43 PM)willdared Wrote:(11-03-2024, 11:30 PM)stirred Wrote:(11-03-2024, 08:54 PM)willdared Wrote:(11-03-2024, 08:26 PM)The reds Wrote: Rumours that the Big 6 are back in talks for the super league, get them gone now.
Don't blame them. Can't believe this new ruling has been voted through...100% agree with what Neville said on the recent overlap, been saying the same myself for ages
What did GNev say?
Everyone should be allowed to spend the same amount and should be based on highest revenue club. One bit he added that I liked is clubs with smaller revenue only so much is club debt, the rest is owners money.
The devil would be in the detail, but the principal of being able to spend the same amount sounds appealing in a way, isn't that what they do in F1?
That definitely sounds fairer than what they have voted through. Would still stop a Newcastle overspending too.
It's pretty similar to how the salary cap works in the NFL.