![]() |
|
Nottingham Forest v Reading - Predictions - Printable Version +- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk) +-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Nottingham Forest v Reading - Predictions (/showthread.php?tid=661) |
RE: Nottingham Forest v Reading - Predictions - Tricky - 24-01-2020 (24-01-2020, 10:33 AM)PsychoStanleyStone Wrote: The scoring, to be totally perfect and clever and in harmony with nature really has to be based on the Fibonacci scale, which starts 0, 1. 1. 2, 3. 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987 ... :huh: :dodgy: RE: Nottingham Forest v Reading - Predictions - Sniffer Dog (Admin) - 24-01-2020 I think we should do whatever Frochy tells us to do. End of :) RE: Nottingham Forest v Reading - Predictions - Paplane - 24-01-2020 (24-01-2020, 10:41 AM)Tricky Wrote: At the end of the day, seeing as we have started this league quite a way into the season, I am using this season as a trial, then rolling it out fully next season proper. So there will be changes made from time to time My suggestion Tricky is keep it simple chap. Just go for a full time score, for say 3 points, then a give single point to people who predicted an incorrect score but got the result right. RE: Nottingham Forest v Reading - Predictions - PsychoStanleyStone - 25-01-2020 (24-01-2020, 05:14 PM)Paplane Wrote:(24-01-2020, 10:41 AM)Tricky Wrote: it is a bit hit and miss at the moment Pap, this reminds me of a Stan Laurel quote ''If you want me to leave I'll stay as long as you want'' it's just 1 question though Pap:: How is it possible to get 'an incorrect score' but 'get the result right', on the precursor of 'Just go for a full time score'? Tricky .... definately |