+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Nottingham Forest - Fulham (/showthread.php?tid=1574)
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - Plymouth red - 28-09-2024
Could probably have played all day and not scored. Bit worried about home form
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - Fumanchew - 28-09-2024
Also I know it’s prevalent across football but there has to be something done about stopping your run up more then once when taking a penno
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - wassy04 - 28-09-2024
(28-09-2024, 05:00 PM)Fumanchew Wrote: Also I know it’s prevalent across football but there has to be something done about stopping your run up more then once when taking a penno
100% what's the keeper meant to do
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - Plymouth red - 28-09-2024
(28-09-2024, 05:02 PM)Itswassy04 Wrote:(28-09-2024, 05:00 PM)Fumanchew Wrote: Also I know it’s prevalent across football but there has to be something done about stopping your run up more then once when taking a penno
100% what's the keeper meant to do
To be fair - it would not be that difficult to get rid of. It's pretty obvious to spot
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - wassy04 - 28-09-2024
Without going into the penalty decisions, what was that team selection? No wingers at home, why not sell Elanga if we weren't going to play him, bizarre. Imagine if Cooper had done that, it's ok though because Nunoball is great apparently. Just high quality, high tempo attacking football right?
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - Plymouth red - 28-09-2024
Just feel all our good work away from home is being undone by our home form. 2 points from wolves, Bournemouth and Fulham ain't a very good return.
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - stefanduma - 28-09-2024
I think that with MGW missing we were not very good and seldom looked like getting a result. We can not become a 1 man team.
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - Tricky - 28-09-2024
(28-09-2024, 05:06 PM)wassy04 Wrote: Without going into the penalty decisions, what was that team selection? No wingers at home, why not sell Elanga if we weren't going to play him, bizarre. Imagine if Cooper had done that, it's ok though because Nunoball is great apparently. Just high quality, high tempo attacking football right?
The team selection was made to nullify Fulhams style of dominating the centre of the pitch. This was working fine up until the penalty, then Nuno was forced into going wide to instill a bit of pace into our attack. Sadly, when he did that we gave Fulham more space around the centre of the pitch to be more creative. Fortunately, they didnt capitalise on having that extra space to play into but did have more possession.
I think today proved just what an asset MGW is. We really missed his drive and creativity today. I have said this before and will restate it, but I just do not see what Dominguez brings to the side.
If im being totally honest, I do think it was a penalty....just. If Murillo hadnt pushed him in the back at the same time,I think it wouldve been waved away. However, I do think the Elanga incident was also a penalty. It was almost a carbon copy of the one awarded to Fulham
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - wassy04 - 28-09-2024
(28-09-2024, 05:39 PM)Tricky Wrote:(28-09-2024, 05:06 PM)wassy04 Wrote: Without going into the penalty decisions, what was that team selection? No wingers at home, why not sell Elanga if we weren't going to play him, bizarre. Imagine if Cooper had done that, it's ok though because Nunoball is great apparently. Just high quality, high tempo attacking football right?
The team selection was made to nullify Fulhams style of dominating the centre of the pitch. This was working fine up until the penalty, then Nuno was forced into going wide to instill a bit of pace into our attack. Sadly, when he did that we gave Fulham more space around the centre of the pitch to be more creative. Fortunately, they didnt capitalise on having that extra space to play into but did have more possession.
I think today proved just what an asset MGW is. We really missed his drive and creativity today. I have said this before and will restate it, but I just do not see what Dominguez brings to the side.
If im being totally honest, I do think it was a penalty....just. If Murillo hadnt pushed him in the back at the same time,I think it wouldve been waved away. However, I do think the Elanga incident was also a penalty. It was almost a carbon copy of the one awarded to Fulham
So the tactics were to secure a 0-0 home draw?
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - Tricky - 28-09-2024
(28-09-2024, 05:45 PM)wassy04 Wrote:(28-09-2024, 05:39 PM)Tricky Wrote:(28-09-2024, 05:06 PM)wassy04 Wrote: Without going into the penalty decisions, what was that team selection? No wingers at home, why not sell Elanga if we weren't going to play him, bizarre. Imagine if Cooper had done that, it's ok though because Nunoball is great apparently. Just high quality, high tempo attacking football right?
The team selection was made to nullify Fulhams style of dominating the centre of the pitch. This was working fine up until the penalty, then Nuno was forced into going wide to instill a bit of pace into our attack. Sadly, when he did that we gave Fulham more space around the centre of the pitch to be more creative. Fortunately, they didnt capitalise on having that extra space to play into but did have more possession.
I think today proved just what an asset MGW is. We really missed his drive and creativity today. I have said this before and will restate it, but I just do not see what Dominguez brings to the side.
If im being totally honest, I do think it was a penalty....just. If Murillo hadnt pushed him in the back at the same time,I think it wouldve been waved away. However, I do think the Elanga incident was also a penalty. It was almost a carbon copy of the one awarded to Fulham
So the tactics were to secure a 0-0 home draw?
More likely the tactics were to not lose
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - wassy04 - 28-09-2024
(28-09-2024, 05:50 PM)Tricky Wrote:(28-09-2024, 05:45 PM)wassy04 Wrote:(28-09-2024, 05:39 PM)Tricky Wrote:(28-09-2024, 05:06 PM)wassy04 Wrote: Without going into the penalty decisions, what was that team selection? No wingers at home, why not sell Elanga if we weren't going to play him, bizarre. Imagine if Cooper had done that, it's ok though because Nunoball is great apparently. Just high quality, high tempo attacking football right?
The team selection was made to nullify Fulhams style of dominating the centre of the pitch. This was working fine up until the penalty, then Nuno was forced into going wide to instill a bit of pace into our attack. Sadly, when he did that we gave Fulham more space around the centre of the pitch to be more creative. Fortunately, they didnt capitalise on having that extra space to play into but did have more possession.
I think today proved just what an asset MGW is. We really missed his drive and creativity today. I have said this before and will restate it, but I just do not see what Dominguez brings to the side.
If im being totally honest, I do think it was a penalty....just. If Murillo hadnt pushed him in the back at the same time,I think it wouldve been waved away. However, I do think the Elanga incident was also a penalty. It was almost a carbon copy of the one awarded to Fulham
So the tactics were to secure a 0-0 home draw?
More likely the tactics were to not lose
Is that what we should be doing at home to Fulham?
RE: Nottingham Forest - Fulham - zicorice - 28-09-2024
(28-09-2024, 02:10 PM)It was a negative Mist From The Trent Wrote: Nuno must have seen something in Fulham to change the system. Got to trust he knows what he's doing.
It was a negative line up, handing a good Fulham side the initiative from the first whistle. Boring game that was heading for 0-0 but for a VAR penalty. Not sure why Nuno was so scared of Fulham on our own pitch though.