+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Down Memory Lane (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Ange (/showthread.php?tid=1706)
RE: Ange - BomberBowyer - 04-10-2025
(04-10-2025, 12:14 PM)northeastred Wrote:(04-10-2025, 11:24 AM)Username Wrote: Saw this on Twitter btw:
PL Clubs sacking 2 managers in the same season:
Leicester 01/02 - RELEGATED
Charlton 06/07 - RELEGATED
Swansea 16/17 - 15th
West Brom 1718 - RELEGATED
Watford - 19/20 - 11th
Leeds 22/23 - RELEGATED
Southampton 23/24 RELEGATED
They were not sacked in the first quarter of the season
Nope and if anything, were sacked too late for any difference to really be made. Bit like it could be if we stuck with Ange till xmas and between now and then the current form continued.
RE: Ange - Username - 04-10-2025
I mean they’re just facts regardless of how you want to spin them.
RE: Ange - wassy04 - 04-10-2025
(04-10-2025, 02:01 PM)Username Wrote: I mean they’re just facts regardless of how you want to spin them.
The only person spinning stats here is you.
These stats are don't match the context of our season at all.
Why not get the list of teams that qualified for Europe then sacked their manager due to a fall out with the new Sporting Director?
Are you suggesting because of these stats we should not sack him?
RE: Ange - Salvatore Matrecano - 04-10-2025
What’s happened is that with the high profile figures of Marinakis and Postecoglou we are now a target and a figure of fun when it goes wrong, much in the same way that Man Utd are right now. Reap what you sow.
Loads of media stories about “whats gone wrong at Forest” This one below from the Mail is a readable look at why the tactics don’t work
RE: Ange - wassy04 - 04-10-2025
(04-10-2025, 02:24 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: What’s happened is that with the high profile figures of Marinakis and Postecoglou we are now a target and a figure of fun when it goes wrong, much in the same way that Man Utd are right now. Reap what you sow.
Loads of media stories about “whats gone wrong at Forest” This one below from the Mail is a readable look at why the tactics don’t work
I've noticed the majority of the fan and media reaction (outside of Sky of course) is mainly just sympathy for the fan base and largely agreement that Ange was an odd appointment.
RE: Ange - ozzyten10 - 04-10-2025
I’m just wondering whether playing teams that are expecting to beat us may be better for Ange. We played very well against saville away- arsenal would be harsh to include. All his other games we have expected to win. The opposition have then got something in the game to hang onto and have sat deep for large parts. I’m probably grasping at straws but maybe it may help?
RE: Ange - Username - 04-10-2025
(04-10-2025, 02:17 PM)wassy04 Wrote:(04-10-2025, 02:01 PM)Username Wrote: I mean they’re just facts regardless of how you want to spin them.
The only person spinning stats here is you.
These stats are don't match the context of our season at all.
Why not get the list of teams that qualified for Europe then sacked their manager due to a fall out with the new Sporting Director?
Are you suggesting because of these stats we should not sack him?
Where did I apply them in the context of our season? Or the subsequent points you mention?
I haven’t suggested anything, just posting actual facts.
I’m sure you’ll apologise for taking what was a relatively simple post to attack it but I guess not
RE: Ange - wassy04 - 04-10-2025
(04-10-2025, 06:00 PM)Username Wrote:(04-10-2025, 02:17 PM)wassy04 Wrote:(04-10-2025, 02:01 PM)Username Wrote: I mean they’re just facts regardless of how you want to spin them.
The only person spinning stats here is you.
These stats are don't match the context of our season at all.
Why not get the list of teams that qualified for Europe then sacked their manager due to a fall out with the new Sporting Director?
Are you suggesting because of these stats we should not sack him?
Where did I apply them in the context of our season? Or the subsequent points you mention?
I haven’t suggested anything, just posting actual facts.
I’m sure you’ll apologise for taking what was a relatively simple post to attack it but I guess not
Your reply implied to me you thought they had merit. I apologise if you don't think they mean anything.
To be clear though, presenting stats out of context is a form of spinning. That's allI meant.
RE: Ange - Trailer Park Tom - 04-10-2025
(04-10-2025, 02:28 PM)wassy04 Wrote:(04-10-2025, 02:24 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: What’s happened is that with the high profile figures of Marinakis and Postecoglou we are now a target and a figure of fun when it goes wrong, much in the same way that Man Utd are right now. Reap what you sow.
Loads of media stories about “whats gone wrong at Forest” This one below from the Mail is a readable look at why the tactics don’t work
I've noticed the majority of the fan and media reaction (outside of Sky of course) is mainly just sympathy for the fan base and largely agreement that Ange was an odd appointment.
An odd appointment that almost certainly had nothing to do with Edu.
RE: Ange - wassy04 - 05-10-2025
(05-10-2025, 03:44 PM)Josh Wrote: Get him gone NOW. One of the worst decisions to hire him in the first place.
Who would we get in though? (Who'd actually be willing to take over)
RE: Ange - Spinky77 - 05-10-2025
Some outlets saying he´s handed his resignation in immediately post match. Saying players won't work for him!
RE: Ange - ozzyten10 - 05-10-2025
That’s bollocks