COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM
Brighton - Nottingham Forest - Printable Version

+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Fan Talk - Forest All Over The World (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Brighton - Nottingham Forest (/showthread.php?tid=1573)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - Reds73 - 23-09-2024

(23-09-2024, 10:27 AM)DR Forest Wrote: Nuno is the manager and an ex goalie.
He will know best if Miguel is ready and a better option than Sels.
Whilst scrutiny is being brought to bear, there’s still an argument that ‘better the devil you know’.
Imagine if Miguel came in and made a mistake against Fulham and we lost our unbeaten run? Nuno would get slaughtered.

I don’t think it’s far off though; for me the main issue with sels is his lack of dominance in the area, currently papered over by Milenkovic’s form, but it is a clear deficiency.

Thing with Sels is the stats show he doesn’t out perform  his expected goals against from a stats perspective.
50% of GK’s in the league will do that.

IMO Miguel saves both goals yesterday. It’s just whether Nuno thinks he is ready mentally to play.

Once you make the change it then wouldn’t help anybody to change it back again.


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - DeesideRed - 23-09-2024

(23-09-2024, 08:04 AM)Paplane Wrote:
(23-09-2024, 07:56 AM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Sels must be at fault for the second although was a great hit, a bit harsh for the first though, think you first need to question why a 5 foot 8 midfielder was given a free header. He made a terrific save from Welbeck a few mins later.

Im not a great fan of Sels but realistically you cannot be dropping him yet simply on the basis we haven’t lost a game. Had we got beat 4-0 it might be a different argument although just because Carlos is a big lad it doesn’t mean he is better. Would Carlos have got down in time to make the Welbeck save? Only Nuno knows who is better, just need to trust his choice.

The real error for the 1st was MGW not closing down the cross. The lad had all the time in the world to chuck it in.

And Wood certainly made his feelings clear about that. Particularly as he'd ran his bollocks off to block a cross in the left back position just before.


I'm actually interested to see what we look like without MGW. He could do with a kick up the arse for me.


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - wassy04 - 23-09-2024

(23-09-2024, 08:04 AM)Paplane Wrote:
(23-09-2024, 07:56 AM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Sels must be at fault for the second although was a great hit, a bit harsh for the first though, think you first need to question why a 5 foot 8 midfielder was given a free header. He made a terrific save from Welbeck a few mins later.

Im not a great fan of Sels but realistically you cannot be dropping him yet simply on the basis we haven’t lost a game. Had we got beat 4-0 it might be a different argument although just because Carlos is a big lad it doesn’t mean he is better. Would Carlos have got down in time to make the Welbeck save? Only Nuno knows who is better, just need to trust his choice.

The real error for the 1st was MGW not closing down the cross. The lad had all the time in the world to chuck it in.

Yep agreed, although he was blaming Wood I think, not sure why!


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - wassy04 - 23-09-2024

(23-09-2024, 11:25 AM)Reds73 Wrote:
(23-09-2024, 10:27 AM)DR Forest Wrote: Nuno is the manager and an ex goalie.
He will know best if Miguel is ready and a better option than Sels.
Whilst scrutiny is being brought to bear, there’s still an argument that ‘better the devil you know’.
Imagine if Miguel came in and made a mistake against Fulham and we lost our unbeaten run? Nuno would get slaughtered.

I don’t think it’s far off though; for me the main issue with sels is his lack of dominance in the area, currently papered over by Milenkovic’s form, but it is a clear deficiency.

Thing with Sels is the stats show he doesn’t out perform  his expected goals against from a stats perspective.
50% of GK’s in the league will do that.

IMO Miguel saves both goals yesterday. It’s just whether Nuno thinks he is ready mentally to play.

Once you make the change it then wouldn’t help anybody to change it back again.

Yeah I think the likely issue is that Miguel is still the safer option. 

Can we land someone better in January? Tough to sign a starting keeper in that window.


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - Fumanchew - 23-09-2024

Bloody hell, didn’t think we were that under fire Sunday 

   


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - wassy04 - 23-09-2024

(23-09-2024, 06:10 PM)Fumanchew Wrote: Bloody hell, didn’t think we were that under fire Sunday 

We were pretty battered during the second half at one point.


Was a weird game really, felt like we were comfortable for 40 mins without creating any chances aside from the penalty. Conceded twice, looked like we'd get thrashed for the early point of the second half then scored again on the break and suddenly was pretty even again.

So not sure what to make of it? Are we good? Was that just another scrappy draw where we were up against it like in the first year against Brighton?


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - ozzyten10 - 23-09-2024

We are competitive in every game. Can argue we rode our luck to get 4 points from 2 very hard away games but can also argue we didn’t get the run of the green or whatever deserved in our home games so far. I think we will need to improve our home form but so far so very good…


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - Plymouth red - 23-09-2024

If we can continue to dig in and grind out results away like we have done against good teams then we are a good side.

What will, however, make a big difference is home form. 2 wins at the city ground in 2024 is a worrying trend and we really could do with getting back to winning ways this weekend


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - Paplane - 25-09-2024

However, the panel disagreed with second caution for Nottingham Forest's Morgan Gibbs-White in their 2-2 draw at Brighton & Hove Albion. Gibbs-White was sent off by referee Rob Jones on the advice of fourth official Anthony Taylor and other members of the on-field team. On a split 3-2 vote, the KMI Panel said that "it's a strong challenge made at full speed but below the threshold for a second caution," with the opposing view being that "the intensity of the challenge is too high and it's a reckless tackle showing disregard to the consequences for the opponent."


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - wassy04 - 26-09-2024

(25-09-2024, 09:41 PM)Paplane Wrote: However, the panel disagreed with second caution for Nottingham Forest's Morgan Gibbs-White in their 2-2 draw at Brighton & Hove Albion. Gibbs-White was sent off by referee Rob Jones on the advice of fourth official Anthony Taylor and other members of the on-field team. On a split 3-2 vote, the KMI Panel said that "it's a strong challenge made at full speed but below the threshold for a second caution," with the opposing view being that "the intensity of the challenge is too high and it's a reckless tackle showing disregard to the consequences for the opponent."

Fair enough, 3-2 though so shows it could've gone either way. Those guys know more than me though! 

It is worth pointing out that Joao Pedro got injured in the tackle and is out this week which does support it being reckless.


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - RyanR - 26-09-2024

(26-09-2024, 12:30 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(25-09-2024, 09:41 PM)Paplane Wrote: However, the panel disagreed with second caution for Nottingham Forest's Morgan Gibbs-White in their 2-2 draw at Brighton & Hove Albion. Gibbs-White was sent off by referee Rob Jones on the advice of fourth official Anthony Taylor and other members of the on-field team. On a split 3-2 vote, the KMI Panel said that "it's a strong challenge made at full speed but below the threshold for a second caution," with the opposing view being that "the intensity of the challenge is too high and it's a reckless tackle showing disregard to the consequences for the opponent."

Fair enough, 3-2 though so shows it could've gone either way. Those guys know more than me though! 

It is worth pointing out that Joao Pedro got injured in the tackle and is out this week which does support it being reckless.

Pedro was already carrying an injury from the game before though


RE: Brighton - Nottingham Forest - Fumanchew - 26-09-2024

I thought that too but didn’t wanna think I’d misheard it