12-12-2019, 04:31 PM
|
Our Track Record In The Loan Market
|
|
12-12-2019, 04:36 PM
We turned down Huckerby who then joined Norwich and lead them to promotion the next year scoring 14 goals.
I would consider Norwich a similar size or slightly smaller club to our own. Since that promotion in 2003/4 they have been promoted to the PL a further 3 times spending 7 seasons there in total. 20 years later we are still here waiting for just one decent attempt. A tale of how differently 2 clubs have been run.
12-12-2019, 06:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-12-2019, 06:25 PM by Strawberry Avenger.)
(12-12-2019, 04:36 PM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: We turned down Huckerby who then joined Norwich and lead them to promotion the next year scoring 14 goals. A sound comparison. Norwich, Forest's 'evil' twin, have shown the way. They also stuck with the guy that had an 'average' season the season before they got promoted. SA.
What about Robbie Blake?
Different class in this league, made a big difference here, and Marthur decided to not bother at 250k. Up there with missing out on Huckerby IMO
12-12-2019, 07:33 PM
Robbie Blake was quality.
13-12-2019, 08:34 AM
So of the 40-50 loans of the last 10 years we have managed to muster about 7-8 who we consider to have been decent.
Shudder.
COYR!
13-12-2019, 10:12 AM
Are you absolutely sure we turned Huckerby down?
I distinctly remember a conversation with him when he was less than complimentary about the club, said he would never have signed in a million years and could not believe he agreed to play for us in the first place, and that is putting it mildly
13-12-2019, 10:18 AM
(13-12-2019, 08:34 AM)Duncan Mckenzie Wrote: So of the 40-50 loans of the last 10 years we have managed to muster about 7-8 who we consider to have been decent. around a 20% success rate which is not very good. The figures are skewed slightly due to the embargo and the number of players we signed on loan during that period; the players signed under Montainer were not any better Take those out of the equation and you have a success rate of around 30% which is still poor
13-12-2019, 11:49 AM
(13-12-2019, 10:18 AM)Jean_claude_killy Wrote:(13-12-2019, 08:34 AM)Duncan Mckenzie Wrote: So of the 40-50 loans of the last 10 years we have managed to muster about 7-8 who we consider to have been decent. Whichever way we look at it whichever way we dress it up it's poor like you say JC. My hope is that it's something the club have realised and looked at and the quality of our loan signings will improve.
13-12-2019, 06:20 PM
I'm of the form belief that Marinakis was involved in the last few windows under Fawaz.
We'd rarely, if ever, loaned in from abroad, then suddenly we start doing it on mass with Dimitru, Lica etc. The only loans we should be looking to bring in are ones such as Colback who have proven pedigree.
14-12-2019, 09:30 AM
(13-12-2019, 06:20 PM)Alf Wrote: I'm of the form belief that Marinakis was involved in the last few windows under Fawaz. I agree with that last line Alf. Nail on head. I just hope that someone at the club is taking note.
COYR!
14-12-2019, 10:55 AM
For me that depends on the over all purpose of the loan.
If we are loaning a player who we have no chance of buying then he should be the finished article with experience. If it is a try before you buy type of loan then that is a different story; Majewski was that type of loan, Figueredo was that type of loan, both players we could have missed out on; Goncalves and Dias are also good examples for a different reason, without the loans we may have paid good money for them and end up with them stuck on the bench. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
