23-04-2024, 10:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-04-2024, 10:24 PM by Trailer Park Tom.)
(23-04-2024, 10:17 PM)ToryTom Wrote:(23-04-2024, 10:13 PM)Trailer Park Tom Wrote:(23-04-2024, 09:37 PM)ToryTom Wrote:(23-04-2024, 09:32 PM)Sausage Roll Wrote:(23-04-2024, 09:21 PM)ToryTom Wrote: All of that describes incompetence not corruption. Nobody would argue against the pgmol being inept. we accused of them conspiring against us.
You keep saying it's not corrupt when you don't know. None of us do. To just brush it off and say it's not possible is naive in the extreme. Corruption exists in every walk of life and in a business awash with as much money as football is it's quite frankly ludicrous to just brush off the possibility that corruption could exist.
As somebody said earlier, if you are accusing somebody of corruption you need to have evidence that is deliberate and not just being rubbish at your job. show me the evidence which proves Atwell, Howard Webb, conspired to not give us three penalties in a game, and i might believe you
Who the f**k cares if you believe him or not. This isn't a court of law, it's a forum where loads people rant about football. You stick Tory in your name and think it's a select committee.
I suspect the premier league and pgmol will care and it will have negative consequences for our football club and probably us as well. You don’t go around making unproven allegations without their being some comeback
You are not the prem or the pgmol thought and Im guessing a geezer called sausage roll wont be presenting to them.
